Literature DB >> 17568389

An assessment of written patient information provided at the genetic clinic and relating to genetic testing in seven European countries.

Celine Lewis1, Pritti Mehta, Alastair Kent, Heather Skirton, Domenico Coviello.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the quality of written information for patients and families about genetic testing, from a range of European countries. Written information relating to genetic testing for five conditions was gathered from genetic departments across seven European countries. Written information for each condition from each country was randomly chosen for assessment. Fourteen key issues had been identified by a number of pre-existing tools (in particular the DISCERN-Genetics tool) as being important for inclusion when developing or assessing material relating to genetic testing. Fifty pieces in total were assessed for the inclusion or omission of key issues. Although the majority of information discussed issues relating to the condition including background and effect (n=48, 96%), treatment and management (n=37, 74%) and heredity and risk (n=49, 98%), only half the information discussed where to obtain additional information and support (n=25, 50%). Less than half the information discussed what happens after the test (n=15, 30%), patient rights (n=12, 24%) and shared decision making (n=12, 24). Benefits were more likely to be included (n=41, 82%) than any risks involved (n=24, 48%). The issue discussed least frequently was the possible psychological and social effects of genetic testing (n=9, 18%). Pre-written leaflets tended to provide a more comprehensive discussion of the issues surrounding genetic testing than personal letters did and should therefore routinely be available to patients alongside personal letters. Written information should include risks and limitations of testing as well as discussion of the psychological and social aspects of genetic testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17568389     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  8 in total

1.  From constraints to opportunities? Provision of psychosocial support in portuguese oncogenetic counseling services.

Authors:  Alvaro Mendes; Liliana Sousa; Milena Paneque
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  EuroGentest patient information leaflets: a free resource available in over 20 languages.

Authors:  Celine Lewis; Alastair Kent; Heather Skirton; Domenico Coviello
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Presenting life with cystic fibrosis: a Q-methodological approach to developing balanced, experience-based prenatal screening information.

Authors:  Katherine F Wright; Louise D Bryant; Stephen Morley; Jenny Hewison; Alistair J A Duff; Daniel Peckham
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  A whisper-game perspective on the family communication of DNA-test results: a retrospective study on the communication process of BRCA1/2-test results between proband and relatives.

Authors:  Joël Vos; Fred Menko; Anna M Jansen; Christi J van Asperen; Anne M Stiggelbout; Aad Tibben
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  An online resource of digital stories about cancer genetics: qualitative study of patient preferences and information needs.

Authors:  Rachel Iredale; Lisa Mundy; Jennifer Hilgart
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 6.  Shared decision making in mental health: prospects for personalized medicine.

Authors:  Robert E Drake; Delia Cimpean; William C Torrey
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.986

7.  Developing patient-friendly genetic and genomic test reports: formats to promote patient engagement and understanding.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Rachel Mills; Kathryn I Pollak; Catherine Rehder; Adam H Buchanan; Isaac M Lipkus; Jennifer H Crow; Michael Datto
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 11.117

8.  What's out there for parents? A systematic review of online information about prenatal microarray and exome sequencing.

Authors:  Michelle Peter; Hannah McInnes-Dean; Jane Fisher; Dagmar Tapon; Lyn S Chitty; Melissa Hill
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-11-07       Impact factor: 3.242

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.