Literature DB >> 17567774

What delay fields tell us about striate cortex.

Edward J Tehovnik1, Warren M Slocum.   

Abstract

It is well known that electrical activation of striate cortex (area V1) can disrupt visual behavior. Based on this knowledge, we discovered that electrical microstimulation of V1 in macaque monkeys delays saccadic eye movements when made to visual targets located in the receptive field of the stimulated neurons. This review discusses the following issues. First, the parameters that affect the delay of saccades by microstimulation of V1 are reviewed. Second, the excitability properties of the V1 elements mediating the delay are discussed. Third, the properties that determine the size and shape of the region of visual space affected by stimulation of V1 are described. This region is called a delay field. Fourth, whether the delay effect is mainly due to a disruption of the visual signal transmitted through V1 or whether it is a disturbance of the motor signal transmitted between V1 and the brain stem saccade generator is investigated. Fifth, the properties of delay fields are used to estimate the number of elements activated directly by electrical microstimulation of macaque V1. Sixth, these properties are used to make inferences about the characteristics of visual percepts induced by such stimulation. Seventh, the disruptive effects of V1 stimulation in monkeys and humans are compared. Eighth, a cortical mechanism to account for the disruptive effects of V1 stimulation is proposed. Finally, these effects are related to normal vision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17567774     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00285.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  9 in total

1.  New methods devised specify the size and color of the spots monkeys see when striate cortex (area V1) is electrically stimulated.

Authors:  Peter H Schiller; Warren M Slocum; Michelle C Kwak; Geoffrey L Kendall; Edward J Tehovnik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Insights into cortical mechanisms of behavior from microstimulation experiments.

Authors:  Mark H Histed; Amy M Ni; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 11.685

3.  Visual prosthesis.

Authors:  Peter H Schiller; Edward J Tehovnik
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 4.  Electrical Stimulation of Visual Cortex: Relevance for the Development of Visual Cortical Prosthetics.

Authors:  William H Bosking; Michael S Beauchamp; Daniel Yoshor
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 6.422

5.  Microstimulation reveals limits in detecting different signals from a local cortical region.

Authors:  Amy M Ni; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Saturation in Phosphene Size with Increasing Current Levels Delivered to Human Visual Cortex.

Authors:  William H Bosking; Ping Sun; Muge Ozker; Xiaomei Pei; Brett L Foster; Michael S Beauchamp; Daniel Yoshor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Depth-dependent detection of microampere currents delivered to monkey V1.

Authors:  Edward J Tehovnik; Warren M Slocum
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Behavioral detection of intra-cortical microstimulation in the primary and secondary auditory cortex of cats.

Authors:  Zhenling Zhao; Yongchun Liu; Lanlan Ma; Yu Sato; Ling Qin
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-27

9.  The stimulus-evoked population response in visual cortex of awake monkey is a propagating wave.

Authors:  Lyle Muller; Alexandre Reynaud; Frédéric Chavane; Alain Destexhe
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 14.919

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.