Literature DB >> 1756742

Influence of negative ultrasound findings on the management of in- and outpatients with suspected deep-vein thrombosis.

M Sluzewski1, M M Koopman, K H Schuur, T J van Vroonhoven, J H Ruijs.   

Abstract

Real-time ultrasonography (US) was used as a single non-invasive method in the management of 174 patients (56 inpatients and 118 outpatients) with suspected deep-vein thrombosis (DVT). Therapeutic decisions were based on the results of ultrasonography alone. If the US examination was abnormal anticoagulant treatment was started. If the initial US examination was normal, no treatment was given and the patient underwent repeated testing and physical examination after 1 day, 7 days and 3 months. In the outpatient group, 1.3% of the ultrasonographic negative patients developed thromboembolic complications (95% confidence limits, 0.03-7.21%). None of the initial ultrasonographic negative patients developed proximal DVT after 1 day and 7 days. In the inpatient group, 10% of the ultrasonographic negative patients developed thromboembolic complications (95% confidence limits, 1.2-31.7%). In 18% of the ultrasonographic negative patients an alternative, unexpected diagnosis was obtained by ultrasound. The most frequent alternative diagnosis was a popliteal cyst. The results indicate that US alone appears to be a safe diagnostic method in the management of outpatients with suspected DVT. In the inpatient group further research is required for definite recommendations regarding a safe ultrasound follow-up schedule.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1756742     DOI: 10.1016/0720-048x(91)90023-o

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  5 in total

1.  D-dimer testing as an adjunct to ultrasonography in patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis: prospective cohort study. The Multicentre Italian D-dimer Ultrasound Study Investigators Group.

Authors:  E Bernardi; P Prandoni; A W Lensing; G Agnelli; G Guazzaloca; G Scannapieco; F Piovella; F Verlato; C Tomasi; M Moia; L Scarano; A Girolami
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-17

Review 2.  Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  J D Douketis; J S Ginsberg
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Steve Goodacre; Fiona Sampson; Steve Thomas; Edwin van Beek; Alex Sutton
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 4.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis: Korean Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Seung-Kee Min; Young Hwan Kim; Jin Hyun Joh; Jin Mo Kang; Ui Jun Park; Hyung-Kee Kim; Jeong-Hwan Chang; Sang Jun Park; Jang Yong Kim; Jae Ik Bae; Sun Young Choi; Chang Won Kim; Sung Il Park; Nam Yeol Yim; Yong Sun Jeon; Hyun-Ki Yoon; Ki Hyuk Park
Journal:  Vasc Specialist Int       Date:  2016-09-30

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of three ultrasonography strategies for deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Noémie Kraaijpoel; Marc Carrier; Grégoire Le Gal; Matthew D F McInnes; Jean-Paul Salameh; Trevor A McGrath; Nick van Es; David Moher; Harry R Büller; Patrick M Bossuyt; Mariska M G Leeflang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.