Literature DB >> 17567309

Mailed urine samples are not an effective screening approach for Chlamydia trachomatis case finding among young men.

M Domeika1, L Oscarsson, A Hallén, E Hjelm, S Sylvan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Frequency of testing is known to be low for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in men aged 20-24 years. The use of mailed, home-obtained urine specimens could increase the uptake of young men and facilitate screening programmes for the detection of asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the home screening approach as a tool for recruitment of asymptomatic men for screening of genital C. trachomatis infections.
METHODS: Men aged 19-24 years old (n = 1936) were invited to participate in home-based testing for genital C. trachomatis infection. Persons who agreed to be tested were provided with a testing kit. Self-collected first void urine was sent for testing to the microbiology laboratory. The test result was accessible on the study's web-page 1 week after testing. Individuals with a diagnosed infection were instructed to contact the venereal disease department.
RESULTS: The response rate was 24% (462/1936). The responders' main reason for not participating was a feeling of being safe regarding STIs (87%; 159/182). The primary reason for this feeling of safety was that the responders were in a steady relationship (59%; 107/159). Having sex outside a steady relationship was reported by 36% (90/250) of the responders. The prevalence of C. trachomatis infection among the responders was 2.02% and the reported history of chlamydial infection was 36% (34/95). Out of the responders, 92% (229/249) were, to varying degrees, concerned about getting STIs; however, the majority (72%; 174/242) estimated the risk to be low.
CONCLUSION: Home screening using web-based answer management is a feasible tool for STI screening, which lowers the threshold for people at risk. In this particular population, however, the response rate was too low to be routinely introduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17567309     DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.02088.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol        ISSN: 0926-9959            Impact factor:   6.166


  6 in total

1.  Recruiting a U.S. national sample of HIV-negative gay and bisexual men to complete at-home self-administered HIV/STI testing and surveys: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Christian Grov; Demetria Cain; Thomas H F Whitfield; H Jonathon Rendina; Mark Pawson; Ana Ventuneac; Jeffrey T Parsons
Journal:  Sex Res Social Policy       Date:  2016-03-01

2.  A randomized trial of home versus clinic-based sexually transmitted disease screening among men.

Authors:  Mary M Reagan; Hanna Xu; Shirley L Shih; Gina M Secura; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Home-based chlamydia testing of young people attending a music festival--who will pee and post?

Authors:  Rachel Sacks-Davis; Judy Gold; Campbell K Aitken; Margaret E Hellard
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 4.  Genital chlamydia prevalence in Europe and non-European high income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shelagh M Redmond; Karin Alexander-Kisslig; Sarah C Woodhall; Ingrid V F van den Broek; Jan van Bergen; Helen Ward; Anneli Uusküla; Björn Herrmann; Berit Andersen; Hannelore M Götz; Otilia Sfetcu; Nicola Low
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Home-based chlamydia and gonorrhoea screening: a systematic review of strategies and outcomes.

Authors:  Muhammad S Jamil; Jane S Hocking; Heidi M Bauer; Hammad Ali; Handan Wand; Kirsty Smith; Jennifer Walker; Basil Donovan; John M Kaldor; Rebecca J Guy
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Comparing mail-in self-collected specimens sent via United States Postal Service versus clinic-collected specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in extra-genital sites.

Authors:  Katheryn R Salow; Adam C Cohen; Claire C Bristow; Mark R McGrath; Jeffrey D Klausner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.