BACKGROUND: The fluorescence intensities of CD3, CD4 on T cells and CD20, CD22 molecules on B cells were quantitatively measured on lymphocytes from chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients and healthy donors. METHODS: The performance of three different types of microbeads was compared, i.e. Quantum molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome (Q-MESF), Quantum simply cellular (QSC), and QuantiBRITE (QB). As all PE-conjugates had a F/P ratio of 1:1, the MESF units represented also the antibody binding capacity (ABC). RESULTS: The ABCs of CD4 and CD20 antigens estimated with QSC (ABC(QSC)) were higher than those assigned with QB (ABC(QB)) with an average difference 49%. Higher numbers of antigenic sites were obtained with Q-MESF than with QSC for CD20 antigen. On the contrary, CD4 antigenic sites numbers estimated with QSC were higher than those estimated with Q-MESF. ABC values estimated with Quantum MESF PE (ABC(Q-MESF)) were approximately 15% higher than ABC(QSC), whereas ABC(Q-MESF) was approximately 49% higher than ABC(QB). Statistically significant correlations were found between the values obtained using various standards. The present study is the first to report down-regulation of CD3 antigen on T cells from patients with CLL. CONCLUSIONS: This study emphasizes the relevance of quantitative measurement of fluorescence intensity by flow cytometry as a standardized approach to measure and interpret the expression of some CLL markers and reduce variability of results obtained at different sites in multi-center clinical studies.
BACKGROUND: The fluorescence intensities of CD3, CD4 on T cells and CD20, CD22 molecules on B cells were quantitatively measured on lymphocytes from chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients and healthy donors. METHODS: The performance of three different types of microbeads was compared, i.e. Quantum molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome (Q-MESF), Quantum simply cellular (QSC), and QuantiBRITE (QB). As all PE-conjugates had a F/P ratio of 1:1, the MESF units represented also the antibody binding capacity (ABC). RESULTS: The ABCs of CD4 and CD20 antigens estimated with QSC (ABC(QSC)) were higher than those assigned with QB (ABC(QB)) with an average difference 49%. Higher numbers of antigenic sites were obtained with Q-MESF than with QSC for CD20 antigen. On the contrary, CD4 antigenic sites numbers estimated with QSC were higher than those estimated with Q-MESF. ABC values estimated with Quantum MESF PE (ABC(Q-MESF)) were approximately 15% higher than ABC(QSC), whereas ABC(Q-MESF) was approximately 49% higher than ABC(QB). Statistically significant correlations were found between the values obtained using various standards. The present study is the first to report down-regulation of CD3 antigen on T cells from patients with CLL. CONCLUSIONS: This study emphasizes the relevance of quantitative measurement of fluorescence intensity by flow cytometry as a standardized approach to measure and interpret the expression of some CLL markers and reduce variability of results obtained at different sites in multi-center clinical studies.
Authors: Gregory A Jasper; Indu Arun; David Venzon; Robert J Kreitman; Alan S Wayne; Constance M Yuan; Gerald E Marti; Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson Journal: Cytometry B Clin Cytom Date: 2010-09-24 Impact factor: 3.058
Authors: Nisar A Baig; Ronald P Taylor; Margaret A Lindorfer; Amy K Church; Betsy R Laplant; Emily S Pavey; Grzegorz S Nowakowski; Clive S Zent Journal: Leuk Lymphoma Date: 2012-05-21
Authors: Nisar A Baig; Ronald P Taylor; Margaret A Lindorfer; Amy K Church; Betsy R LaPlant; Adam M Pettinger; Tait D Shanafelt; Grzegorz S Nowakowski; Clive S Zent Journal: J Immunol Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Nathalie A Johnson; Merrill Boyle; Ali Bashashati; Stephen Leach; Angela Brooks-Wilson; Laurie H Sehn; Mukesh Chhanabhai; Ryan R Brinkman; Joseph M Connors; Andrew P Weng; Randy D Gascoyne Journal: Blood Date: 2008-11-24 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Prashant R Tembhare; Gerald Marti; Adrian Wiestner; Heba Degheidy; Mohammed Farooqui; Robert J Kreitman; Gregory A Jasper; Constance M Yuan; David Liewehr; David Venzon; Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Stephen W Jarantow; Barbara S Bushey; Jose R Pardinas; Ken Boakye; Eilyn R Lacy; Renouard Sanders; Manuel A Sepulveda; Sheri L Moores; Mark L Chiu Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2015-08-10 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Marta de Almeida Santiago; Bruna de Paula Fonseca E Fonseca; Christiane de Fátima da Silva Marques; Edimilson Domingos da Silva; Alvaro Luiz Bertho; Ana Cristina Martins de Almeida Nogueira Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-12-09 Impact factor: 3.240