Literature DB >> 17565683

Primary omental gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST).

Takeshi Todoroki1, Takaaki Sano, Shinji Sakurai, Atsuki Segawa, Tamotsu Saitoh, Koichi Fujikawa, Shuji Yamada, Nobutsune Hirahara, Yoshito Tsushima, Ryuji Motojima, Teiji Motojima.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We report herein a rare case of primary omental gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). CASE
PRESENTATION: A 65 year-old man was referred to our hospital with a huge abdominal mass occupying the entire left upper abdomen as shown by sonography. On computed tomography (CT), this appeared as a heterogeneous low-density mass with faint enhancement. Abdominal angiography revealed that the right gastroepiploic artery supplied the tumor. With such an indication of gastric GIST, liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma or mesothelioma laparotomy was performed and revealed that this large mass measured 20 x 17 x 6 cm, arising from the greater omentum. It was completely resected. Histopathologically, it was composed of proliferating spindle and epithelioid cells with an interlacing bundle pattern. Immunohistochemically, the tumor was positive for myeloid stem cell antigen (CD34), weakly positive for c-KIT (CD117) and slightly positive for neuron-specific enolase (NSE), but negative for cytokeratin (CK), alpha-smooth muscle actin (SMA) and S-100 protein. A mutation was identified in the platelet-derived growth factor alpha (PDGFRA) juxtamembrane domain (exon 12, codon561) and the tumor was diagnosed as an omental GIST. The postoperative course was uneventful. The patient is treated by Glevec(R) and is alive well with no sign of relapse.
CONCLUSION: Our case demonstrated a weak immunohistochemical expression of c-kit (CD117) and a point mutation in PDGFRA exon 12 resulting in an Asp for Val561 substitution. Imatinib therapy as an adjuvant to complete resection has been carried out safely. Because of the rarity of primary omental GISTs, it is inevitable to analyze accumulating data from case reports for a better and more detailed understanding of primary omental GISTs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17565683      PMCID: PMC1924523          DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-5-66

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1477-7819            Impact factor:   2.754


Background

GISTs are mesenchymal tumors, the majority of which is KIT (CD117)-positive, typically arising in association with the muscularis propria of the gastrointestinal tract wall. Accordingly, they occur most frequently in the stomach (60%), jejunum and ileum (30%), and less frequently in the duodenum (5%), < 5% colorectal < 1% in the esophagus and appendix [1]. A small number may originate not from the omentum, but from outside the gastrointestinal tract; these are designated extra-GISTs (EGISTs)[2]. To the best of our knowledge, thus far only 28 cases of primary omental GISTs, including that described in the present study, have been reported. Histopathologic and immunohistochemical characteristics of EGISTs are similar to GISTs, the majority of both having mutually exclusive gain-of-function KIT/PDGFRA mutations. However, because of the rarity of the omental GISTs, it is difficult to assess their malignant potential, prognostic factors or efficacy of surgery alone or in combination with molecular targeting chemotherapy with the Kit/PDGFRA tyrosine kinase inhibitor Imatinib, and their overall prognosis. Here, we report a rare case of primary omental myxoid epithelioid GIST which we have characterized immunohistochemically and genetically. We review the English-language literature on primary omental GISTs.

Case presentation

A 65-year-old man was referred to our hospital in October 2006 with a huge abdominal tumor. A firm mass was palpated extending from the epigastrium to the left hypogastrium. There were no laboratory abnormalities, except a slight elevation of the total bilirubin (1.3 mg/dl) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH: 217 IU/L) levels in the serum. The tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA19-9) were within the normal range. Ultrasonography showed that the mass occupied almost the entire upper abdomen anterior to the bowel loops. On computed tomography (CT), a mass behind the left hepatic lobe showed heterogeneous low density with faint enhancement (Fig. 1). Abdominal angiography revealed that the tumor was vascularized mainly from the right epigastric artery (Fig. 2). We suspected liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, mesothelioma, or gastric GIST. At laparotomy on October 2006, a well-encapsulated tumor was found in the greater omentum. There was no adhesion to adjacent organs and structures but a pinpoint adhesion to the stomach. The right gastroepiploic artery and vein were prominent and stretched by the tumor, and a major supply vessel diverged from it in one stalk (Fig. 3). There was no evidence of metastasis in the abdominal cavity. Grossly, a well-demarcated reddish-gray solid tumor, 20 × 17 × 6 cm in size, showed irregular modularity (Fig 3). The cut surfaces were tan-colored and contained focally necrotic areas and a cystic nodule. Histopathologically, the tumor was composed of proliferating epithelioid cells and myxoid cells with an interlacing bundle pattern (Fig. 4A &4B). The cellularity was relatively high and the frequency of mitotic figures was 2 of 50 high power fields (HPF). The MIB-1 index was 4.4% (Fig. 4D). The tumor cells were diffusely immunoreactive for myeloid stem cell antigen (CD34), weakly or focally positive for c-kit proto-oncogene protein product (CD117) (Fig. 4C) and slightly positive for neuron-specific enolase (NSE). However, there was no staining for cytokeratin (CK), alpha-smooth muscle actin (SMA) or S-100 protein. Direct sequencing demonstrated mutations in the platelet-derived growth factor alpha (PDGFRA) gene exon 12, codon 561, encoding a thymine to adenine substitution (Fig. 5). These findings were consistent with a myxoid epithelioid GIST lacking myogenic features and neural attributes. The patient had a complete tumor resection and an uneventful postoperative course. He was treated by per os administration of Glevec® 300 mg/day as an adjuvant postoperative molecular targeting chemotherapy and has been living disease-free for 6 months.
Figure 1

Computed Tomography. A huge tumor behind the left hepatic lobe showed heterogeneous low density with faint enhancement. GB, gallbladder; GEA, gastroepiploic artery; T, tumor; PNC, pancreas; SPL, spleen.

Figure 2

3-D reconstructed angiography of the gastroepiploic artery. A major tumor-supply artery diverges from the right gastroepiploic artery (REA).

Figure 3

Intra-operative photograph. Scissors indicate major tumor-feeding vessels (TFDV).

Figure 4

Photomicrographs of the primary omental GIST tumor. A. Epithelioid components of GIST. Tumor cells show eosinophilic cytoplasm and peripherally placed nuclei, and are mostly cohesive (H&E). B. Some components show a spindle cell pattern with myxoid stroma (H&E). C. Tumor cells weakly immunoreactive for c-kit (CD117). D. Immunostaining for MIB-1: sparse of positive tumor cells are shown (MIB-1 index: 4.4%).

Figure 5

Genomic sequencing of the PDGFRA gene. Direct sequencing analysis showing a point mutation at codon 561 (GTC to GAC) in exon12. Val561 is changed to Asp.

Computed Tomography. A huge tumor behind the left hepatic lobe showed heterogeneous low density with faint enhancement. GB, gallbladder; GEA, gastroepiploic artery; T, tumor; PNC, pancreas; SPL, spleen. 3-D reconstructed angiography of the gastroepiploic artery. A major tumor-supply artery diverges from the right gastroepiploic artery (REA). Intra-operative photograph. Scissors indicate major tumor-feeding vessels (TFDV). Photomicrographs of the primary omental GIST tumor. A. Epithelioid components of GIST. Tumor cells show eosinophilic cytoplasm and peripherally placed nuclei, and are mostly cohesive (H&E). B. Some components show a spindle cell pattern with myxoid stroma (H&E). C. Tumor cells weakly immunoreactive for c-kit (CD117). D. Immunostaining for MIB-1: sparse of positive tumor cells are shown (MIB-1 index: 4.4%). Genomic sequencing of the PDGFRA gene. Direct sequencing analysis showing a point mutation at codon 561 (GTC to GAC) in exon12. Val561 is changed to Asp.

Discussion

GISTs are mesenchymal tumors originating primarily from interstitial cells of Cajal or related stem cell-like precursors [3] of the gastrointestinal tract wall. Typically, they are characterized by the expression of the receptor tyrosine kinase Kit (CD117)[4], although some GISTs do not or only weakly express this marker [5]. Primary omental GISTs, Sakurai et al. implicated their possible pathogenesis from ICC-like Kit-positive cells existing in the normal omentum [6]. It is commonly accepted that mutually exclusive mutations in Kit or PDGFRA receptor tyrosine kinase proteins play a central role in GIST pathogenesis [7-10]. This is clearly illustrated by the collected data from primary omental GISTs (Table 2). Mutually exclusive gain-of-function Kit or PDGFRA mutations represent in-frame deletions, point mutations, duplications or insertions. Mutations in the Kit juxtamembrane domain (exon 11) are the most common in GISTs of all sites, whereas a rare Kit extracellular domain (exon 9) Ala502-Tyr503 duplication is specific for intestinal GISTs. Mutations in PDGFRA have been identified in the juxtamembrane (exon 12), as observed in our case, and tyrosine kinase domains (exons 14 and 18), nearly exclusively in gastric GISTs, mostly epithelioid variants. Some Kit and PDGFRA mutations carry prognostic value. The Kit/PDGFRA tyrosine kinase inhibitor Imatinib has been successfully used in the treatment of metastatic GISTs for more than 5 years [10,11]. Microscopic features are site-dependent and the majority (more than 85%) appears as spindle cell tumors [11,12]. However, only half of our collected omental GISTs appeared to be spindle cell tumors, the remaining being epithelioid and myxoid (Table 1). No correlation between prognosis and histologic type has been reported. On the other hand, it is well known that tumor size and mitotic activity are the best prognostic features [10]. In our case, the tumor size and the mitotic activity expressed per 50 HPFs were 20 cm and 2, respectively. It is hardly predict accurately the risk for disease progression and malignant potential of our case, because of scarcity of the primary omental GIST. Based on the criteria advocated by Miettinen and Lasota, these two tumor parameters place the tumor in group 3b, at the intermediate risk [10], although according to the risk assessment proposed by Fletcher, et al., our patient displayed high-risk feature (tumor size above 10 cm, irrespective of low number of mitoses) [13].
Table 2

Immunohistochemistry and Mutations in the primary omental GISTs

Case No.HistologyImmunohistochemistryMutations
KITCD34S100SMADesminGeneSite

15SpindlePositive+---C-kitExon11, MS
16SpindlePositive+---C-kitExon11, IFD
17SpindlePositive+---C-kitExon11, MS
18SpindlePositive+---C-kitExon11, MS
19SpindlePositive+-Weak-C-kitExon11, IFD
22Myxoid epithelioidWeak+-+-PDGFRAExon18 del D842V
23EpithelioidWeak----PDGFRAExon18 DIMH842-845
26EpithelioidWeak+NANANAPDGFRAExon18
28Myxoid epithelioidWeak+---PDGFRAExon12, V561D

MS: miss sense, IFD: in-frame deletion, NA: not available

Table 1

Case review of the primary omental GISTs

Case No.Authors (Year)Age/GenderSize (cm)HistologyMitosis/50HPFOutcome
1Takahashi [17] (1998)71/M17Sp1–3ANED, 2-Mo
2Miettinen [18] (1999)58/F2.5Ep1Dead of colon cancer, 2.3-Yrs
389/M2.5Mixed7DUC, 3-Yrs
431/F7.5Sp19ANED, 3.5-Yrs
580/F10Ep7ANED, 2.0-Yrs
644/M12Ep<1ANED, 1.6-Yrs
772/M15Mixed26ANED, 1.5-Yrs
867/F16.5Sp5LTF
956/F20Ep0LTF
1064/M20Sp4ANED, 2.0-Yrs
1134/M23Sp1LTF
1260/M24Ep1ANED, 3.4-Yrs
1368/F26Sp2ANED, 8.5-Yrs
1470/F36Ep<1LTF
15Sakurai [6] (2001)39/F6Sp7.7**NA
1652/F11.5Sp4.3**NA
1774/F8Sp<1**NA
1865/F16Sp0.9**NA
1961/F23Sp22**NA
20Fukuda [19] (2001)45/M4.5Sp<1*ANED, 0.9-Yrs
21Suzuki [15] (2003)65/M13Sp5–8 13.8*DOD 1.3-Yrs (Liver mets.)
22Sakurai [8] (2004)73/F4Myxoid3*ANED, 4-Mo
2352/M>20Ep4*ANED, 13-Mo
24Yamamoto [9](2004)62/F11Ep3ANED, 0.5-Yrs
2554//M15Ep3ANED, 5.2-Yrs
2649/F17Ep1ANED, 4.0-Yrs
27Caricato [20] (2005)84/F≤5SpNAANED, 0.3-Yrs
28Present case (2006)65/M20Myxoid2ANED, 0.5-Yrs

Ep: epithelioid, SP: spindle, ANED: alive with no evident disease, Mo: month, Yrs: years, DUC: Dead of unknown cause, *: MIB-1-labeling index. **: K-67 labeling index (%), LFT: lost to follow-up, NA: not available, DOD: dead of disease,

Case review of the primary omental GISTs Ep: epithelioid, SP: spindle, ANED: alive with no evident disease, Mo: month, Yrs: years, DUC: Dead of unknown cause, *: MIB-1-labeling index. **: K-67 labeling index (%), LFT: lost to follow-up, NA: not available, DOD: dead of disease, Immunohistochemistry and Mutations in the primary omental GISTs MS: miss sense, IFD: in-frame deletion, NA: not available Because of possible relapse even after complete resection of omental GISTs [14-16] and the objective response rate of 67 % of Imatinib to the mutation in PDGFRA exon 12 [11], our patient received daily oral administration of 300 mg Glevec®, (we applied 15% reduced dose, referring to a report by Cormier, et al. after took account of a smaller average of Japanese build than American) [14,16]. At the present time, there are no signs of toxicity and no evidence of relapse. However, because of the short follow-up period and rarity of the primary omental GISTs, it is difficult to assess appropriately their malignant potential, efficacy of different treatment procedures and their overall prognosis. In order to improve overall understanding of the primary omental GISTs, it is useful to analyze the collected detailed data from reported cases.

Conclusion

Our case demonstrated a weak immunohistochemical expression of c-kit (CD117) and a point mutation in PDGFRA exon 12 resulting in an Asp for Val561 substitution. Because of the rarity of primary omental GISTs, it is difficult to assess their malignant potential and their overall prognosis. Imatinib therapy as an adjuvant to complete resection has been carried out safely and may prevent relapse to prolong long-term survival. It is essential to analyze accumulating data from case reports for a better and more detailed understanding of primary omental GISTs.

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

TS, SS and AS had contributed as molecular tumor pathologist. TS, KF, SY, RM and TM contributed as a gastrointestinal surgeon in operative performance and postoperative treatment. NH and YT contributed as gastroenterologist and diagnostic radiologist. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
  20 in total

1.  Gastrointestinal pacemaker cell tumor (GIPACT): gastrointestinal stromal tumors show phenotypic characteristics of the interstitial cells of Cajal.

Authors:  L G Kindblom; H E Remotti; F Aldenborg; J M Meis-Kindblom
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a spectrum of disease.

Authors:  Cord Sturgeon; Gregorio Chejfec; N Joseph Espat
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.279

3.  Gain-of-function mutations of c-kit in human gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  S Hirota; K Isozaki; Y Moriyama; K Hashimoto; T Nishida; S Ishiguro; K Kawano; M Hanada; A Kurata; M Takeda; G Muhammad Tunio; Y Matsuzawa; Y Kanakura; Y Shinomura; Y Kitamura
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-01-23       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors/smooth muscle tumors (GISTs) primary in the omentum and mesentery: clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 26 cases.

Authors:  M Miettinen; J M Monihan; M Sarlomo-Rikala; A J Kovatich; N J Carr; T S Emory; L H Sobin
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  Myxoid epithelioid gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) with mast cell infiltrations: a subtype of GIST with mutations of platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha gene.

Authors:  Shinji Sakurai; Tadashi Hasegawa; Yuji Sakuma; Yutaka Takazawa; Atsushi Motegi; Takashi Nakajima; Ken Saito; Masashi Fukayama; Tadakazu Shimoda
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.466

6.  c-kit and PDGFRA mutations in extragastrointestinal stromal tumor (gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the soft tissue).

Authors:  Hidetaka Yamamoto; Yoshinao Oda; Ken-ichi Kawaguchi; Norimoto Nakamura; Tomonari Takahira; Sadafumi Tamiya; Tsuyoshi Saito; Yumi Oshiro; Masayuki Ohta; Takashi Yao; Masazumi Tsuneyoshi
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.394

7.  A primary solitary tumor of the lesser omentum with immunohistochemical features of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  T Takahashi; S Kuwao; M Yanagihara; A Kakita
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  KIT-negative gastrointestinal stromal tumors: proof of concept and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Fabiola Medeiros; Christopher L Corless; Anette Duensing; Jason L Hornick; Andre M Oliveira; Michael C Heinrich; Jonathan A Fletcher; Christopher D M Fletcher
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 9.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): definition, occurrence, pathology, differential diagnosis and molecular genetics.

Authors:  Markku Miettinen; Jerzy Lasota
Journal:  Pol J Pathol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.072

10.  Malignant tumor, of the gastrointestinal stromal tumor type, in the greater omentum.

Authors:  Kazufumi Suzuki; Gengo Kaneko; Kouji Kubota; Naoto Horigome; Hitoshi Hikita; Osamu Senga; Makoto Miyakawa; Hisashi Shimojo; Takeshi Uehara; Nobuo Itoh
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 7.527

View more
  17 in total

1.  Primary omental gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) presenting with a large abdominal mass and spontaneous haemoperitoneum.

Authors:  Isaac Seow-En; Francis Seow-Choen; Tony Kiat Hon Lim; Wei Qiang Leow
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-11-03

2.  Greater omentum gastrointestinal stromal tumor with PDGFRA-mutation and hemoperitoneum.

Authors:  Yoko Murayama; Masayuki Yamamoto; Ryuichiro Iwasaki; Tamana Miyazaki; Yukiko Saji; Yoshinori Doi; Haruki Fukuda; Seiichi Hirota; Masahiro Hiratsuka
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2012-05-15

3.  Caecal gastrointestinal stromal tumor with perforation and obstruction.

Authors:  M R Sreevathsa
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-09-22

4.  Secondary resistance of extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors to imatinib mesylate: report of a case.

Authors:  Koji Ando; Eiji Oki; Masahiko Sugiyama; Yan Zhao; Aya Kojima; Hidetaka Yamamoto; Yoichi Yamashita; Hiroshi Saeki; Akinobu Taketomi; Masaru Morita; Yoshihiro Kakeji; Shunichi Tsujitani; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor-Single-Center Experience with Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Vijay Borgaonkar; Sushil Deshpande; Viraj Borgaonkar; Mukesh Rarthod
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 0.656

6.  Extra-Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor of the Greater Omentum: Unusual Case Report.

Authors:  Mohamed Tarchouli; Ahmed Bounaim; Mohamed Essarghini; Badr Aitidir; Massama Lomdo; Mustapha Benmoussa; Mohamed Oukabli; Abdelmounaim Ait-Ali; Khalid Sair
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2016-12

Review 7.  Extragastrointestinal stromal tumors of the omentum: review apropos of a case with a novel gain-of-function KIT mutation.

Authors:  Georgia Dedemadi; George Georgoulis; Dimitrios Kontopanos; Evangelos Anagnostou; George Morphopoulos; Jean-François Emile; Constantinos Christopoulos
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2009

8.  Extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the omentum: a rare case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Dimitris Fagkrezos; Zisis Touloumis; Maria Giannila; Charalampos Penlidis; Kleo Papaparaskeva; Charikleia Triantopoulou
Journal:  Rare Tumors       Date:  2012-08-08

Review 9.  Extragastrointestinal stromal tumor of the mesoappendix: CT findings and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Wenhua Li; Yanfen Cui; Gang Ren; Jun Wang; Xiangru Wu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Primary Extra-gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor of Retroperitoneum.

Authors:  Claudio Casella; Vincenzo Villanacci; Filippo D'Adda; Manuela Codazzi; Bruno Salerni
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2012-04-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.