Literature DB >> 17565503

Granger causality between multiple interdependent neurobiological time series: blockwise versus pairwise methods.

Xue Wang1, Yonghong Chen, Steven L Bressler, Mingzhou Ding.   

Abstract

Granger causality is becoming an important tool for determining causal relations between neurobiological time series. For multivariate data, there is often the need to examine causal relations between two blocks of time series, where each block could represent a brain region of interest. Two alternative methods are available. In the pairwise method, bivariate autoregressive models are fit to all pairwise combinations involving one time series from the first block and one from the second. The total Granger causality between the two blocks is then derived by summing pairwise causality values from each of these models. This approach is intuitive but computationally cumbersome. Theoretically, a more concise method can be derived, which we term the blockwise Granger causality method. In this method, a single multivariate model is fit to all the time series, and the causality between the two blocks is then computed from this model. We compare these two methods by applying them to cortical local field potential recordings from monkeys performing a sensorimotor task. The obtained results demonstrate consistency between the two methods and point to the significance potential of utilizing Granger causality analysis in understanding coupled neural systems.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17565503     DOI: 10.1142/S0129065707000944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Neural Syst        ISSN: 0129-0657            Impact factor:   5.866


  17 in total

1.  Detecting causal interdependence in simulated neural signals based on pairwise and multivariate analysis.

Authors:  C Yang; R Le Bouquin Jeannes; G Faucon; F Wendling
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2010

2.  Canonical Granger causality between regions of interest.

Authors:  Syed Ashrafulla; Justin P Haldar; Anand A Joshi; Richard M Leahy
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Human thalamus regulates cortical activity via spatially specific and structurally constrained phase-amplitude coupling.

Authors:  Mahsa Malekmohammadi; W Jeff Elias; Nader Pouratian
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  A study of problems encountered in Granger causality analysis from a neuroscience perspective.

Authors:  Patrick A Stokes; Patrick L Purdon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  More discussions for granger causality and new causality measures.

Authors:  Sanqing Hu; Yu Cao; Jianhai Zhang; Wanzeng Kong; Kun Yang; Yanbin Zhang; Xun Li
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  A Sparsification Approach for Temporal Graphical Model Decomposition.

Authors:  Ning Ruan; Ruoming Jin; Victor E Lee; Kun Huang
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Conf Data Min       Date:  2009-12-06

7.  Functional MRI and multivariate autoregressive models.

Authors:  Baxter P Rogers; Santosh B Katwal; Victoria L Morgan; Christopher L Asplund; John C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  Abnormalities in resting-state functional connectivity in early human immunodeficiency virus infection.

Authors:  Xue Wang; Paul Foryt; Renee Ochs; Jae-Hoon Chung; Ying Wu; Todd Parrish; Ann B Ragin
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2011

9.  Frequency-specific directed interactions in the human brain network for language.

Authors:  Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen; Annika Hultén; Nietzsche Lam; André F Marquand; Julia Uddén; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Estimating the directed information to infer causal relationships in ensemble neural spike train recordings.

Authors:  Christopher J Quinn; Todd P Coleman; Negar Kiyavash; Nicholas G Hatsopoulos
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 1.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.