Literature DB >> 17565476

[Port stapling for simplified port implantation in laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding].

A Türler1, J Standop, N Schäfer, P Decker, A Hirner, D Decker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the applicability of a port stapling device to simplify and improve port implantation in laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB).
METHODS: From November 2005 to September 2006, a prospective study was conducted on 23 consecutive patients who underwent LAGB with Swedish adjustable gastric banding. Patients were randomized to either conventional titanium-port implantation or port stapling using the "Velocity" device.
RESULTS: No differences in age, body weight, body mass index, fascia depth or incision length were reported between the groups. Port implantation time was significantly less using port stapling (90+/-24 s) compared to conventional port implantation (521+/-138 s). Port related complaints postoperatively and at follow-up were equal in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Port stapling is an excellent tool to facilitate port implantation, particularly in massively obese patients with a thick abdominal wall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17565476     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-007-1349-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of SAGB QC "classic" titanium port and Velocity port: pilot phase prospective randomized study on perioperative and short-term postoperative implantation outcomes.

Authors:  Martin Fried; Karin Kormanova; Mojmir Kasalicky
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Port complications following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity.

Authors:  Andrei Keidar; Einat Carmon; Amir Szold; Subhi Abu-Abeid
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Injection port complications after gastric banding: incidence, management and prevention.

Authors:  H Weiss; H Nehoda; B Labeck; K Hourmont; M Lanthaler; F Aigner
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  A prospective randomized trial of placement of the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band: comparison of the perigastric and pars flaccida pathways.

Authors:  Paul E O'Brien; John B Dixon; Cheryl Laurie; Margaret Anderson
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2005 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Obesity surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  S Sauerland; L Angrisani; M Belachew; J M Chevallier; F Favretti; N Finer; A Fingerhut; M Garcia Caballero; J A Guisado Macias; R Mittermair; M Morino; S Msika; F Rubino; R Tacchino; R Weiner; E A M Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic Swedish adjustable gastric banding: a five-year prospective study.

Authors:  Rudolf Steffen; Laurent Biertho; Thomas Ricklin; Gracyna Piec; Fritz F Horber
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Port function after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity.

Authors:  M Korenkov; S Sauerland; N Yücel; L Köhler; P Goh; J Schierholz; H Troidl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-05-06       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Optimization of access-port placement for the lap-band system.

Authors:  Hadar Spivak; David Gold; Carlos Guerrero
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 9.  Adjustable silicone gastric banding adverse events reported to the Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  S Lori Brown; Marie H Reid; Hesha Jani Duggirala
Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants       Date:  2003
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Own experience improving port implantation in laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

Authors:  Tomasz Szewczyk; Przemysław Janczak; Bogdan Modzelewski
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 1.195

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.