Literature DB >> 17565355

Risk management measures for chemicals: the "COSHH essentials" approach.

A N I Garrod1, P G Evans, C W Davy.   

Abstract

"COSHH essentials" was developed in Great Britain to help duty holders comply with the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health (COSHH) Regulations. It uses a similar approach to that described in the new European "REACH" Regulation (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals; EC No. 1907/2006 of the European Parliament), insofar as it identifies measures for managing the risk for specified exposure scenarios. It can therefore assist REACH duty holders with the identification and communication of appropriate risk-management measures. The technical basis for COSHH essentials is explained in the original papers published in the Annals of Occupational Hygiene. Its details will, therefore, not be described here; rather, its ability to provide a suitable means for communicating risk-management measures will be explored. COSHH essentials is a simple tool based on an empirical approach to risk assessment and risk management. The output is a "Control Guidance Sheet" that lists the "dos" and "don'ts" for control in a specific task scenario. The guidance in COSHH essentials recognises that exposure in the workplace will depend not just on mechanical controls, but also on a number of other factors, including administrative and behavioural controls, such as systems of work, supervision and training. In 2002, COSHH essentials was made freely available via the internet (http://www.coshh-essentials.org.uk/). This electronic delivery enabled links to be made between product series that share tasks, such as drum filling, and with ancillary guidance, such as setting up health surveillance for work with a respiratory sensitiser. COSHH essentials has proved to be a popular tool for communicating good control practice. It has attracted over 1 million visits to its site since its launch. It offers a common benchmark of good practice for chemical users, manufacturers, suppliers and importers, as well as regulators and health professionals.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17565355     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jes.7500585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1559-0631            Impact factor:   5.563


  6 in total

1.  Expanding control banding for workplace silica exposures throughout the Americas.

Authors:  Catherine C Beaucham; Thomas J Lentz; Faye L Rice
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec

2.  Outbreak of silicosis in Spanish quartz conglomerate workers.

Authors:  Aránzazu Pérez-Alonso; Juan Antonio Córdoba-Doña; José Luis Millares-Lorenzo; Estrella Figueroa-Murillo; Cristina García-Vadillo; José Romero-Morillos
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014 Jan-Mar

3.  Evaluation of the COSHH Essentials model with a mixture of organic chemicals at a medium-sized paint producer.

Authors:  Eun Gyung Lee; James Slaven; Russell B Bowen; Martin Harper
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2010-11-03

4.  Checklist model to improve work practices in small-scale demolition operations with silica dust exposures.

Authors:  Custodio Muianga; Carol Rice; Thomas Lentz; James Lockey; Richard Niemeier; Paul Succop
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Exposure Models for REACH and Occupational Safety and Health Regulations.

Authors:  John William Cherrie; Wouter Fransman; Gerardus Antonius Henrikus Heussen; Dorothea Koppisch; Keld Alstrup Jensen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Review and Improvement of Chemical Hazard Risk Management of Korean Occupational Safety and Health Agency.

Authors:  Saemi Shin; Sang-Hoon Byeon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.