Literature DB >> 17565102

Prospects and pitfalls: use of the RAI-HC assessment by the Department of Veterans Affairs for home care clients.

Catherine Hawes1, Brant E Fries, Mary L James, Marylou Guihan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs has adopted two functional assessment systems that guide care planning: one for nursing home residents (the Resident Assessment Instrument [RAI]) and a compatible one for home care clients (RAI-HC). The purpose of this article is to describe the RAI-HC (often referred to as the Minimum Data Set-Home Care or MDS-HC) and its uses and offer lessons learned from implementation experiences in other settings. DESIGN AND METHODS: We reviewed implementation challenges associated both with the RAI and the RAI-HC in the United States, Canada, and other adopter countries, and drew on these to suggest lessons for the Department of Veterans Affairs as well as other entities implementing the RAI-HC.
RESULTS: Beyond its clinical utility, there are a number of evidence-based uses for the assessment system. The resident-level data can be aggregated and analyzed, and scales identify clinical conditions and risk for various types of negative outcomes. In addition, the data can be used for other programmatic and research purposes, such as determining eligibility, setting payment rates for contract care, and evaluating clinical interventions. At the same time, there are a number of implementation challenges the Department of Veterans Affairs and other organizations may face. IMPLICATIONS: Policy makers and program managers in any setting, including state long-term-care programs, who wish to implement an assessment system must anticipate and address a variety of implementation problems with a clear and consistent message from key leadership, adequate training and clinical support for assessors, and appropriate planning and resources for data systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17565102     DOI: 10.1093/geront/47.3.378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gerontologist        ISSN: 0016-9013


  10 in total

1.  Multidimensional geriatric assessment: back to the future.

Authors:  Darryl Wieland; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 6.053

2.  Effect of Early Palliative Care on End-of-Life Health Care Costs: A Population-Based, Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Hsien Seow; Lisa C Barbera; Kimberlyn McGrail; Fred Burge; Dawn M Guthrie; Beverley Lawson; Kelvin K W Chan; Stuart J Peacock; Rinku Sutradhar
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-08-13

3.  Data for improvement and clinical excellence: protocol for an audit with feedback intervention in home care and supportive living.

Authors:  Kimberly D Fraser; Anne E Sales; Hannah M O'Rourke; Corinne Schalm
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  The Method for Assigning Priority Levels (MAPLe): a new decision-support system for allocating home care resources.

Authors:  John P Hirdes; Jeff W Poss; Nancy Curtin-Telegdi
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 8.775

5.  Affirming the Value of the Resident Assessment Instrument: Minimum Data Set Version 2.0 for Nursing Home Decision-Making and Quality Improvement.

Authors:  Lindsay S Drummond; Susan E Slaughter; C Allyson Jones; Adrian S Wagg
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2015-07-30

6.  Reliability of the interRAI suite of assessment instruments: a 12-country study of an integrated health information system.

Authors:  John P Hirdes; Gunnar Ljunggren; John N Morris; Dinnus H M Frijters; Harriet Finne Soveri; Len Gray; Magnus Björkgren; Reudi Gilgen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Symptom trajectories of non-cancer patients in the last six months of life: Identifying needs in a population-based home care cohort.

Authors:  Katrin Conen; Dawn M Guthrie; Tara Stevens; Samantha Winemaker; Hsien Seow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Case-finding of dementia in general practice and effects of subsequent collaborative care; design of a cluster RCT.

Authors:  Pim van den Dungen; Eric P Moll van Charante; Harm W J van Marwijk; Henriëtte E van der Horst; Peter M van de Ven; Hein P J van Hout
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Using an accumulation of deficits approach to measure frailty in a population of home care users with intellectual and developmental disabilities: an analytical descriptive study.

Authors:  Katherine McKenzie; Hélène Ouellette-Kuntz; Lynn Martin
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.921

10.  Detection of vision and /or hearing loss using the interRAI Community Health Assessment aligns well with common behavioral vision/hearing measurements.

Authors:  Andrea Urqueta Alfaro; Dawn M Guthrie; Natalie A Phillips; M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Paul Mick; Cathy McGraw; Walter Wittich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.