Literature DB >> 17564518

Helping relationships and genetic propensities: a combinatoric study of DRD2, mentoring, and educational continuation.

Michael J Shanahan1, Lance D Erickson, Stephen Vaisey, Andrew Smolen.   

Abstract

From conception to death, helping relationships promote positive development and enable people to surmount challenges in their lives. Is it the case that the negative consequences of a genetic propensity for risky behaviors can be attenuated by helping relationships (a G x E)? But is it also the case that people with such a genetic propensity are less likely to have helping relationships compared to people without such a propensity (a rGE)? We illustrate this complex pattern of gene-environment interplay by drawing on the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health and a combinatoric analytic strategy. We focus on a gene associated with dopamine receptor type 2 (DRD2 TaqIA), student-mentor relationships, and educational continuation beyond secondary school. Results reveal that, for both white and black males, DRD2 A1+ (A1A1 and A1A2 genotypes) is associated with a decreased likelihood of school continuation compared to their counterparts with DRD2 A1-; mentors who are teachers compensate for this negative association (a G x E); and youth with DRD2 A1+ are less likely to have a mentor who is a teacher than their counterparts with DRD2 A1- (a rGE).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17564518     DOI: 10.1375/twin.10.2.285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet        ISSN: 1832-4274            Impact factor:   1.587


  8 in total

Review 1.  Genetic Thinking in the Study of Social Relationships: Five Points of Entry.

Authors:  David Reiss
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-09

2.  The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) sibling pairs data.

Authors:  Kathleen Mullan Harris; Carolyn Tucker Halpern; Brett C Haberstick; Andrew Smolen
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 1.587

Review 3.  Gene-environment interactions in geriatric depression.

Authors:  Francis E Lotrich
Journal:  Psychiatr Clin North Am       Date:  2011-06

Review 4.  Neurogenetic and epigenetic correlates of adolescent predisposition to and risk for addictive behaviors as a function of prefrontal cortex dysregulation.

Authors:  Kenneth Blum; Marcelo Febo; David E Smith; A Kenison Roy; Zsolt Demetrovics; Frans J Cronjé; John Femino; Gozde Agan; James L Fratantonio; Subhash C Pandey; Rajendra D Badgaiyan; Mark S Gold
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.576

5.  How genes and the social environment moderate each other.

Authors:  David Reiss; Leslie D Leve; Jenae M Neiderhiser
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  DIFFERENTIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TO CONTEXT: A PROMISING MODEL OF THE INTERPLAY OF GENES AND THE SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT.

Authors:  Ronald L Simons; Steven R H Beach; Ashley B Barr
Journal:  Adv Group Process       Date:  2012

7.  The influence of dopaminergic gene variants on decision making in the ultimatum game.

Authors:  Martin Reuter; Andrea Felten; Sabrina Penz; Anna Mainzer; Sebastian Markett; Christian Montag
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Attractiveness Compensates for Low Status Background in the Prediction of Educational Attainment.

Authors:  Shawn Bauldry; Michael J Shanahan; Rosemary Russo; Brent W Roberts; Rodica Damian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.