Literature DB >> 17563909

The utility of the general practice research database to examine selected congenital heart defects: a validation study.

K E Wurst1, S A Ephross, J Loehr, D W Clark, H A Guess.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this research was (1) to validate that ventricular septal defect (VSD), tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), and coarctation of the aorta (COA) can be studied in the UK General practice research database (GPRD) and (2) to understand which of the available GPRD components (computerized medical records, questionnaires, and maternal/infant free text) provide maximal information about these heart defects.
METHODS: Using a practitioner questionnaire, the positive predictive value (PPV) of the computerized medical record for VSD, TOF, and COA were determined. Both infant and maternal free text was examined. Concordance between the infant free text information and questionnaires was calculated. The proportion of infant information captured in the maternal free text was determined.
RESULTS: A 93% response rate was achieved. Based on questionnaire responses, an overall PPV of 93.5% was achieved (VSD = 95%, TOF = 90%, COA = 100%). Approximately half of the records contained infant free text information including information on the type and size of VSD, echocardiogram findings, and surgery. Concordance between the infant's free text and questionnaire information occurred in most of the cases (92-100%). The proportion of infant information in the maternal free text was low (4-19%).
CONCLUSION: The GPRD computerized medical records are sufficient to assess VSD, TOF, and COA. This study confirms that maternal free text provides a low yield of limited information pertaining to the infants' defect, while the infant free text may provide an additional information usually obtainable from practitioner questionnaires. The information provided by an infant free text may limit the need for practitioner questionnaire validation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17563909     DOI: 10.1002/pds.1431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  13 in total

Review 1.  Validity of diagnostic coding within the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nada F Khan; Sian E Harrison; Peter W Rose
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Identifying major congenital malformations in the UK General Practice Research Database (GPRD): a study reporting on the sensitivity and added value of photocopied medical records and free text in the GPRD.

Authors:  Rachel A Charlton; John G Weil; Marianne C Cunnington; Corinne S de Vries
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Comparing the General Practice Research Database and the UK Epilepsy and Pregnancy Register as tools for postmarketing teratogen surveillance: anticonvulsants and the risk of major congenital malformations.

Authors:  Rachel A Charlton; John G Weil; Marianne C Cunnington; Sayantani Ray; Corinne S de Vries
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Medical databases in studies of drug teratogenicity: methodological issues.

Authors:  Vera Ehrenstein; Henrik T Sørensen; Leiv S Bakketeig; Lars Pedersen
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 4.790

5.  Using free text information to explore how and when GPs code a diagnosis of ovarian cancer: an observational study using primary care records of patients with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  A Rosemary Tate; Alexander G R Martin; Aishath Ali; Jackie A Cassell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Prevalence and Incidence Trends for Diagnosed Prescription Opioid Use Disorders in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Andrew J M Cooper; Jenna Willis; Janice Fuller; Heike Benecke; James Leighton-Scott; Frank Andersohn; Joseph Kim; Christoph Maier; Roger D Knaggs
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2017-04-27

7.  The epidemiology of osteonecrosis: findings from the GPRD and THIN databases in the UK.

Authors:  C Cooper; M Steinbuch; R Stevenson; R Miday; N B Watts
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Validation and validity of diagnoses in the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review.

Authors:  Emily Herrett; Sara L Thomas; W Marieke Schoonen; Liam Smeeth; Andrew J Hall
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Sex prevalence of major congenital anomalies in the United Kingdom: a national population-based study and international comparison meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rachel Sokal; Laila J Tata; Kate M Fleming
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2014-02-12

10.  First trimester exposure to anxiolytic and hypnotic drugs and the risks of major congenital anomalies: a United Kingdom population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Lu Ban; Joe West; Jack E Gibson; Linda Fiaschi; Rachel Sokal; Pat Doyle; Richard Hubbard; Liam Smeeth; Laila J Tata
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.