| Literature DB >> 17563172 |
Abstract
This research focused on confidence intervals (CIs) for 10 measures of monotonic association between ordinal variables. Standard errors (SEs) were also reviewed because more than 1 formula was available per index. For 5 indices, an element of the formula used to compute an SE is given that is apparently new. CIs computed with different SEs were compared in simulations with small samples (N = 25, 50, 75, or 100) for variables with 4 or 5 categories. With N > 25, many CIs performed well. Performance was best for consistent CIs due to N. Cliff and colleagues (N. Cliff, 1996; N. Cliff & V. Charlin, 1991; J. D. Long & N. Cliff, 1997). CIs for Spearman's rank correlation were also examined: Parameter coverage was erratic and sometimes egregiously underestimated. Copyright 2007 APA, all rights reserved.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17563172 DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.185
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychol Methods ISSN: 1082-989X