Literature DB >> 17562982

Effect of central corneal thickness on dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in primary open-angle glaucoma.

Matthias C Grieshaber1, Andreas Schoetzau, Claudia Zawinka, Josef Flammer, Selim Orgul.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the dependence of dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) on central corneal thickness (CCT) in primary open-angle glaucoma.
METHODS: In a prospective study, the interocular (right vs left eye) difference in intraocular pressure measured by DCT and GAT was compared with the interocular CCT difference in 125 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.
RESULTS: Dynamic contour tonometry measurements (mean +/- SD, 19.4 +/- 4.1 mm Hg) were significantly (P=.004) higher than GAT measurements (mean +/- SD, 15.5 +/- 3.4 mm Hg), correlating significantly with each other (r(2)=0.82, P<.001). The interocular difference in intraocular pressure correlated significantly with the interocular CCT difference for GAT (r=0.30, P=.001) and DCT (r=0.23, P=.02) readings. Dynamic contour tonometry and GAT intraocular pressure differences significantly increased with older age (slope, 0.033 [95% confidence interval, 0.002-0.064] mm Hg/y; P=.03) but not with thicker CCT (slope, 0.006 [95% confidence interval, -0.003 to 0.017] mm Hg/mum; P=.22).
CONCLUSIONS: In this series, GAT and DCT measurements were dependent on CCT in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Because intraocular pressure differences between DCT and GAT were independent of CCT, DCT and GAT are susceptible to similar measurement biases depending on CCT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17562982     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.125.6.740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  5 in total

1.  Dependence of dynamic contour and Goldmann applanation tonometries on peripheral corneal thickness.

Authors:  Federico Saenz-Frances; Claudia Sanz-Pozo; Lara Borrego-Sanz; Luis Jañez; Laura Morales-Fernandez; Jose Maria Martinez-de-la-Casa; Julian Garcia-Sanchez; Julian Garcia-Feijoo; Enrique Santos-Bueso
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Correlation Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry, Uncorrected and Corrected Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Stage of Glaucoma.

Authors:  Josephine Wachtl; Marc Töteberg-Harms; Sonja Frimmel; Malgorzata Roos; Christoph Kniestedt
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 7.389

3.  Correlation of intraocular pressure measured with goldmann and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Tony Realini; Robert N Weinreb; Gerald Hobbs
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry.

Authors:  Anne Herr; Andreas Remky; Thalia Hirsch; Corinna Rennings; Niklas Plange
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-05-03

5.  [Intraocular pressure elevation after vitrectomy-Goldmann applanation tonometry measures lower intraocular pressure than dynamic contour tonometry].

Authors:  Sebastian Bäurle; Anja Viestenz; Berthold Seitz; Arne Viestenz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 1.059

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.