Literature DB >> 17562105

Conceptual models as hypotheses in monitoring urban landscapes.

Todd R Lookingbill1, Robert H Gardner, Philip A Townsend, Shawn L Carter.   

Abstract

Many problems and challenges of ecosystem management currently are driven by the rapid pace and spatial extent of landscape change. Parks and reserves within areas of high human population density are especially challenged to meet the recreational needs of local populations and to preserve valued environmental resources. The complex problem of managing multiple objectives and multiple resources requires an enormous quantity of information, and conceptual models have been proposed as tools for organizing and interpreting this information. Academics generally prefer a bottom-up approach to model construction that emphasizes ecologic theory and process, whereas managers often use a top-down approach that takes advantage of existing information to address more pragmatic objectives. The authors propose a formal process for developing, applying, and testing conceptual models to be used in landscape monitoring that reconciles these seemingly opposing perspectives. The four-step process embraces the role of hypothesis testing in the development of models and evaluation of their utility. An example application of the process to a network of national parks in and around Washington, DC illustrates the ability of the approach to systematically identify monitoring data that would both advance ecologic theory and inform management decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17562105     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-005-0246-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.644


  6 in total

1.  Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines.

Authors:  J E Houlahan; C S Findlay; B R Schmidt; A H Meyer; S L Kuzmin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-04-13       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Using environmental stressor information to predict the ecological status of Maryland non-tidal streams as measured by biological indicators.

Authors:  J H Vølstad; N E Roth; G Mercurio; M T Southerland; D E Strebel
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Human population in the biodiversity hotspots.

Authors:  R P Cincotta; J Wisnewski; R Engelman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-04-27       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Probability of tree seedling establishment changes across a forest-old field edge gradient.

Authors:  Scott J Meiners; Steward T A Pickett; Steven N Handel
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.844

5.  Vegetation Responses to Edge Environments in Old-Growth Douglas-Fir Forests.

Authors:  Jiquan Chen; Jerry F Franklin; Thomas A Spies
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  Geographic sensitivity of fine particle mass to emissions of SO2 and NOx.

Authors:  Stephen F Mueller; Elizabeth M Bailey; Jimmie J Kelsoe
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 9.028

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  A framework for assessing climate change impacts on water and watershed systems.

Authors:  Thomas E Johnson; Christopher P Weaver
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 3.266

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.