OBJECT: Even with good results, conventional disc operations may result in subsequent damage due to trauma. Endoscopic techniques have become the standard in many areas because of the advantages they offer intraoperatively and postoperatively in rehabilitation. The goal of this prospective study was to examine the expanded technical possibilities of full-endoscopic transforaminal and interlaminar resection of herniated lumbar discs in which the authors used newly developed optics and instruments. The focus was on questions of achieving sufficient decompression, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of the minimally invasive procedure. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-two patients underwent follow up for 2 years after undergoing surgery. In addition to general and specific parameters, the following measuring instruments were used: a visual analog scale, the German version of the North American Spine Society instrument, and the Oswestry Disability Index of low-back pain disability. Postoperatively 84% of the patients no longer had leg pain, and 12% had only occasional pain. The results of decompression were equivalent to those of conventional procedures. The incidence of traumatization was reduced. Epidural scarring was minimized. The recurrence rate was 6.0%. No serious surgical complications were observed. Resection of the herniated disc was technically possible in all cases in which the new instruments were used. CONCLUSIONS: The authors view the aforedescribed techniques, which offer the advantages of a truly minimally invasive procedure, as a sufficient and safe supplementation and alternative to conventional procedures, when the appropriate indication criteria are heeded. The new endoscope with its 4.2-mm working channel and corresponding instruments significantly reduced the technical problems.
OBJECT: Even with good results, conventional disc operations may result in subsequent damage due to trauma. Endoscopic techniques have become the standard in many areas because of the advantages they offer intraoperatively and postoperatively in rehabilitation. The goal of this prospective study was to examine the expanded technical possibilities of full-endoscopic transforaminal and interlaminar resection of herniated lumbar discs in which the authors used newly developed optics and instruments. The focus was on questions of achieving sufficient decompression, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of the minimally invasive procedure. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-two patients underwent follow up for 2 years after undergoing surgery. In addition to general and specific parameters, the following measuring instruments were used: a visual analog scale, the German version of the North American Spine Society instrument, and the Oswestry Disability Index of low-back pain disability. Postoperatively 84% of the patients no longer had leg pain, and 12% had only occasional pain. The results of decompression were equivalent to those of conventional procedures. The incidence of traumatization was reduced. Epidural scarring was minimized. The recurrence rate was 6.0%. No serious surgical complications were observed. Resection of the herniated disc was technically possible in all cases in which the new instruments were used. CONCLUSIONS: The authors view the aforedescribed techniques, which offer the advantages of a truly minimally invasive procedure, as a sufficient and safe supplementation and alternative to conventional procedures, when the appropriate indication criteria are heeded. The new endoscope with its 4.2-mm working channel and corresponding instruments significantly reduced the technical problems.
Authors: Hormuzdiyar H Dasenbrock; Stephen P Juraschek; Lonni R Schultz; Timothy F Witham; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ali Bydon Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Date: 2012-03-09