Literature DB >> 1756161

Psychosocial evaluation of heart transplant candidates: an international survey of process, criteria, and outcomes.

M E Olbrisch1, J L Levenson.   

Abstract

Heart transplant programs were surveyed regarding psychosocial evaluation process, criteria, and outcomes. There was considerable disagreement among programs when a patient is rejected on psychosocial grounds with regard to the use of second opinions and how often patients are informed of the reasons. Wide discrepancies in criteria used and rates of patients refused on psychosocial grounds were discovered. More than 70% of all programs excluded patients for transplantation on the grounds of dementia, active schizophrenia, current suicidal ideation, history of multiple suicide attempts, severe mental retardation, current heavy alcohol use, and current use of addictive drugs. Lack of consensus was found for some exclusion criteria (cigarette smoking, obesity, noncompliance, recent alcohol or drug abuse, criminality, personality disorder, mild mental retardation, controlled schizophrenia, and affective disorder). The proportion of patients rejected for transplantation on psychosocial grounds ranged from 0% to 37%, with an average rate of 5.6% in the United States and 2.5% in non-U.S. programs. This survey thus supports the need for research on the validity and reliability of psychosocial selection criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1756161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  8 in total

Review 1.  Psychosocial Challenges in Solid Organ Transplantation.

Authors:  Kristin Kuntz; Stephan R Weinland; Zeeshan Butt
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2015-09

Review 2.  Bioethics for clinicians: 13. Resource allocation.

Authors:  M F McKneally; B M Dickens; E M Meslin; P A Singer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-07-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Guidelines as rationing tools: a qualitative analysis of psychosocial patient selection criteria for cardiac procedures.

Authors:  M K Giacomini; D J Cook; D L Streiner; S S Anand
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-03-06       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Difficulty in securing treatment for degenerative hip disease in a patient with Down syndrome: the gap remains open.

Authors:  Chandler E Gill; Henry M Taylor; K T Lin; Bimal B Padaliya; William J Newman; Anna I Abramovitch; CaraLee R Richardson; P David Charles
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.798

5.  Psychological adjustment of pediatric lung transplantation candidates and their parents.

Authors:  S M Thompson; A M Digirolamo; G B Mallory
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  1996-12

6.  Relapse prevention treatment for liver transplant patients.

Authors:  C C Wagner; D L Haller; M E Olbrisch
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  1996-12

Review 7.  Who gets a lung transplant? Assessing the psychosocial decision-making process for transplant listing.

Authors:  Amber N Lewandowski; Jared Lyon Skillings
Journal:  Glob Cardiol Sci Pract       Date:  2016-09-30

Review 8.  Transplant eligibility for patients with affective and psychotic disorders: a review of practices and a call for justice.

Authors:  Katherine L Cahn-Fuller; Brendan Parent
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 2.652

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.