Literature DB >> 17561190

Obstructive mullerian anomalies and modern laparoscopic management.

L C Strawbridge1, N S Crouch, A S Cutner, S M Creighton.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Congenital uterine anomalies are common, although the majority are asymptomatic. When an obstructed system exists, women may present with abdominal pain, or dysmenorrhea. Removal of the obstructed horn may be required in the symptomatic patient. In the past, surgical treatment necessitated a laparotomy.
DESIGN: After preoperative diagnosis and planning using magnetic resonance imaging, laparoscopic removal of the obstructed uterine horn and tube was performed. Morcellation of tissue was used to permit removal through a 15mm port.
SETTING: A central London tertiary referral teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 15 women aged between 13 and 41.
INTERVENTIONS: Between 1999 and 2005, all women underwent laparoscopic removal of the obstructed uterine horn and tube. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recovery, hospital stay, length of operation.
RESULTS: All women recovered well, with an operation time of 80 to 300 minutes and an average hospital stay of 5 days.
CONCLUSIONS: A laparoscopic approach is a safe and appropriate technique for the removal of an obstructed uterine horn.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17561190     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2006.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol        ISSN: 1083-3188            Impact factor:   1.814


  6 in total

Review 1.  Is magnetic resonance imaging sufficient to diagnose rudimentary uterine horn? A case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Kate Devine; Tara McCluskey; Melinda Henne; Alicia Armstrong; Aradhana M Venkatesan; Alan Decherney
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 4.137

2.  Clinical approach for the classification of congenital uterine malformations.

Authors:  Grigoris F Grimbizis; Rudi Campo
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2012-03-10

Review 3.  The comprehensiveness of the ESHRE/ESGE classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies: a systematic review of cases not classified by the AFS system.

Authors:  A Di Spiezio Sardo; R Campo; S Gordts; M Spinelli; C Cosimato; V Tanos; S Brucker; T C Li; M Gergolet; C De Angelis; L Gianaroli; G Grimbizis
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies.

Authors:  Grigoris F Grimbizis; Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo; Sotirios H Saravelos; Stephan Gordts; Caterina Exacoustos; Dominique Van Schoubroeck; Carmina Bermejo; Nazar N Amso; Geeta Nargund; Dirk Timmermann; Apostolos Athanasiadis; Sara Brucker; Carlo De Angelis; Marco Gergolet; Tin Chiu Li; Vasilios Tanos; Basil Tarlatzis; Roy Farquharson; Luca Gianaroli; Rudi Campo
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2015-11-04

5.  The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies.

Authors:  Grigoris F Grimbizis; Stephan Gordts; Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo; Sara Brucker; Carlo De Angelis; Marco Gergolet; Tin-Chiu Li; Vasilios Tanos; Hans Brölmann; Luca Gianaroli; Rudi Campo
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  The ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies.

Authors:  Grigoris F Grimbizis; Stephan Gordts; Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo; Sara Brucker; Carlo De Angelis; Marco Gergolet; Tin-Chiu Li; Vasilios Tanos; Hans Brölmann; Luca Gianaroli; Rudi Campo
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2013-06-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.