Literature DB >> 17561048

Are malocclusions more prevalent and severe now? A comparative study of medieval skulls from Norway.

Jon Petter Evensen1, Bjørn Øgaard.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of malocclusion in modern populations is higher than in excavated samples from ancient times. Presently, more than 30% of children and adolescents in the Scandinavian countries receive orthodontic treatment. The aims of this study were to describe the prevalence and severity of malocclusions in a sample of medieval Norwegians, to evaluate the need for treatment by using the Norwegian need for orthodontic treatment index (NOTI), and to compare these findings with a modern sample already analyzed with the same index.
METHODS: The material consisted of 85 male and 61 female medieval skulls from abandoned and later excavated graveyards of 16th century Oslo that were evaluated with the NOTI.
RESULTS: Only 36% of the medieval group showed objective assessed needs for orthodontic treatment, compared with 65% of the present-day sample. Among the skulls, the objective needs for treatment were 27% for the males and 49% for the females. No sex differences related to severity or prevalence of malocclusion were found in the modern sample. The medieval sample arranged according to severity was great need (B), 7%; obvious need (C), 29%; and little/no need (D/E), 64%. The findings in the modern sample were B, 20%; C, 44%; and D/E, 35%. The female skulls showed greater severity and prevalence than the male skulls. No skull had very great need (A).
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates a significant increase in both the prevalence and the severity of malocclusions during the last 400 to 700 years in Oslo, Norway. Furthermore, although no sex differences were found in the modern sample, females had both a higher prevalence of malocclusions and more severe malocclusions than did males in the past.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17561048     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  11 in total

1.  Phenotypic diversity in white adults with moderate to severe Class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Lina M Moreno Uribe; Sara C Howe; Colleen Kummet; Kaci C Vela; Deborah V Dawson; Thomas E Southard
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Impact of social and economic characteristics on orthodontic treatment among children and teenagers in France.

Authors:  A Germa; M Kaminski; C Nabet
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 3.383

Review 3.  Clinical practice. Later orthodontic complications caused by risk factors observed in the early years of life.

Authors:  Katarzyna Emerich; Anna Wojtaszek-Slominska
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Dental crowding: the role of genetics and tooth wear.

Authors:  David Normando; Marco A O Almeida; Cátia C A Quintão
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Dental occlusion in a split Amazon indigenous population: genetics prevails over environment.

Authors:  David Normando; Jorge Faber; João Farias Guerreiro; Cátia Cardoso Abdo Quintão
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Association between maternal education and malocclusion in Mongolian adolescents: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Tsasan Tumurkhuu; Takeo Fujiwara; Yuko Komazaki; Yoko Kawaguchi; Toshihiro Tanaka; Johji Inazawa; Ganjargal Ganburged; Amarsaikhan Bazar; Takuya Ogawa; Keiji Moriyama
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Prevalence of caries and malocclusion in an indigenous population in Chiapas, Mexico.

Authors:  Kjeld Aamodt; Oscar Reyna-Blanco; Ricardo Sosa; Rebecca Hsieh; Myriam De la Garza Ramos; Martha Garcia Martinez; Maria Fernanda Orellana
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.607

8.  Malocclusion in early anatomically modern human: a reflection on the etiology of modern dental misalignment.

Authors:  Rachel Sarig; Viviane Slon; Janan Abbas; Hila May; Nir Shpack; Alexander Dan Vardimon; Israel Hershkovitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Cephalometric comparison of cesarean and normal births.

Authors:  Merve Goymen; Tolga Topcuoglu; Ali Murat Aktan; Ozlem Isman
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

10.  The Jaw Epidemic: Recognition, Origins, Cures, and Prevention.

Authors:  Sandra Kahn; Paul Ehrlich; Marcus Feldman; Robert Sapolsky; Simon Wong
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 8.589

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.