Literature DB >> 17559561

The case for modifying the Gleason grading system.

Daniel M Berney1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2007        PMID： 17559561     DOI： 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07036.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN： 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Gleason score and lethal prostate cancer: does 3 + 4 = 4 + 3?

Authors:  Jennifer R Stark; Sven Perner; Meir J Stampfer; Jennifer A Sinnott; Stephen Finn; Anna S Eisenstein; Jing Ma; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Tobias Kurth; Massimo Loda; Edward L Giovannucci; Mark A Rubin; Lorelei A Mucci
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Validation of a contemporary prostate cancer grading system using prostate cancer death as outcome.

Authors:  Daniel M Berney; Luis Beltran; Gabrielle Fisher; Bernard V North; David Greenberg; Henrik Møller; Geraldine Soosay; Peter Scardino; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 3.  Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: A Grading from Gleason to the New Grade-Group System: A Historical and Critical Review

Authors:  Muhammad Abrar Barakzai
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2019-03-26

4.  Analysis of Prostate Adenocarcinoma Histopathological Types in Relation to Tumor Grade.

Authors:  Andrei PĂnuŞ; Cristiana Eugenia Simionescu; Petru Octavian DrĂgoescu; Paul Tomescu; Alex Emilian Stepan
Journal:  Curr Health Sci J       Date:  2020-12-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.