Literature DB >> 17559376

Somatostatin and gabexate for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis prevention: meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.

Dan Rudin1, Alexander Kiss, Robert V Wetz, Vincent M Sottile.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Prior studies have suggested the efficacy of somatostatin and gabexate in post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis prevention. We examined this notion in our study.
METHODS: An extensive literature search led to the inclusion of seven homogeneous high-quality studies (Jadad score >or=4), involving 3,130 patients. The studies were grouped according to the drug's length of administration: given as an infusion for 12 h (groups SOM1 and GAB1 for somatostatin and gabexate, respectively); given as an infusion for less then 12 h (groups SOM2 and GAB2 for somatostatin and gabexate, respectively); and given as a bolus (group SOM3 for somatostatin, none identified for gabexate). Separate meta-analyses investigating post-procedural pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia rates were conducted in a random effects model.
RESULTS: Pancreatitis analyses yielded significant risk differences for the SOM1, SOM3 and GAB1 groups. The resulting values were 7.7% (95% confidence intervals [CI][3.4 to 12.0], P < 0.0001), 8.2% (95% CI [4.4 to 12.0], P < 0.0001) and 5.2% (95% CI [1.1 to 9.4], P = 0.01), respectively. No statistically significant risk differences were observed for the SOM2 and GAB2 groups: -2.3% (95% CI [-5.2 to 0.5], P = 0.11) and -1.1% (95% CI [-3.8 to 1.6], P = 0.41), respectively. Hyperamylasemia analyses yielded significant risk differences for the SOM1 and SOM3 groups (P = 0.017 and 0.001, respectively), although not for the SOM2, GAB1 and GAB2 groups (P = 0.44, 0.49 and 0.47, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Somatostatin administered as a bolus seems to be an efficacious measure of post-ERCP pancreatitis prevention, reducing pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia rates, and being applicable to clinical practice. Further study is required before its introduction into routine care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17559376     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.04928.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  13 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice guideline for post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Authors:  Tetsuya Mine; Toshio Morizane; Yoshiaki Kawaguchi; Ryukichi Akashi; Keiji Hanada; Tetsuhide Ito; Atsushi Kanno; Mitsuhiro Kida; Hiroyuki Miyagawa; Taketo Yamaguchi; Toshihiko Mayumi; Yoshifumi Takeyama; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  Acute Pancreatitis-Progress and Challenges: A Report on an International Symposium.

Authors:  Elham Afghani; Stephen J Pandol; Tooru Shimosegawa; Robert Sutton; Bechien U Wu; Santhi Swaroop Vege; Fred Gorelick; Morihisa Hirota; John Windsor; Simon K Lo; Martin L Freeman; Markus M Lerch; Yoshihisa Tsuji; Gil Y Melmed; Wahid Wassef; Julia Mayerle
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.327

3.  Meta-analysis: somatostatin or its long-acting analogue, octreotide, for prophylaxis against post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Authors:  Fumio Omata; Gautam Deshpande; Yasuharu Tokuda; Osamu Takahashi; Sachiko Ohde; David L Carr-Locke; Joshua L Jacobs; Tetsuya Mine; Tsuguya Fukui
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 4.  Endoscopic prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.

Authors:  Tae Hoon Lee; Do Hyun Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Low-dose rectal diclofenac for prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Taiga Otsuka; Seiji Kawazoe; Shunya Nakashita; Saori Kamachi; Satoshi Oeda; Chinatsu Sumida; Takumi Akiyama; Keisuke Ario; Masaru Fujimoto; Masanobu Tabuchi; Takahiro Noda
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-02-18       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 6.  Prophylactic pancreatic stent placement and post-ERCP pancreatitis: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Takero Mazaki; Kazunari Mado; Hideki Masuda; Motomi Shiono
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 7.527

7.  Nafamostat for Prophylaxis against Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis Compared with Gabexate.

Authors:  Jae Hyuck Chang; In Seok Lee; Hyung Keun Kim; Yu Kyung Cho; Jae Myung Park; Sang Woo Kim; Myung-Gyu Choi; In-Sik Chung
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 4.519

8.  Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis.

Authors:  F Donnellan; Michael F Byrne
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.260

9.  Pancreatic Stenting Reduces Post-ERCP Pancreatitis and Biliary Sepsis in High-Risk Patients: A Randomized, Controlled Study.

Authors:  He-Kun Yin; Hai-En Wu; Qi-Xiang Li; Wei Wang; Wei-Lin Ou; Harry Hua-Xiang Xia
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.260

10.  Pre-study protocol MagPEP: a multicentre randomized controlled trial of magnesium sulphate in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Authors:  Gabriele Fluhr; Julia Mayerle; Eckhard Weber; Ali Aghdassi; Peter Simon; Thomas Gress; Thomas Seufferlein; Joachim Mössner; Andreas Stallmach; Thomas Rösch; Martina Müller; Britta Siegmund; Petra Büchner-Steudel; Ina Zuber-Jerger; Marcus Kantowski; Albrecht Hoffmeister; Jonas Rosendahl; Thomas Linhart; Jochen Maul; László Czakó; Péter Hegyi; Matthias Kraft; Georg Engel; Thomas Kohlmann; Anne Glitsch; Tilman Pickartz; Christoph Budde; Claudia Nitsche; Kirsten Storck; Markus M Lerch
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.