Literature DB >> 17558882

Unintended effects of poverty programmes on childbearing in less developed countries: experimental evidence from Latin America.

Guy Stecklov1, Paul Winters, Jessica Todd, Ferdinando Regalia.   

Abstract

Because conditional cash transfer (CCT) programmes (which make payments to poor households, conditional on their behaviour) potentially affect both household resource levels and parental preferences for quality vs. quantity of children, they may have unintended consequences for fertility. We use panel data from experimental CCT programmes in three Latin American countries to assess the unintended impact of these programmes on childbearing. Our findings, based on difference-in-difference models, show that the programme in Honduras, which inadvertently created large incentives for childbearing, may have raised fertility by between 2 and 4 percentage points. The CCT programmes in the two other countries, Mexico and Nicaragua, did not have the same unintended incentives for childbearing, and in these countries we found no net impact on fertility. Subsequent analysis examined several potential mechanisms by which fertility in Honduras may have been raised but was not able to identify a primary mechanism with the available data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17558882     DOI: 10.1080/00324720701300396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)        ISSN: 0032-4728


  14 in total

Review 1.  What works in family planning interventions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lisa Mwaikambo; Ilene S Speizer; Anna Schurmann; Gwen Morgan; Fariyal Fikree
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2011-06

2.  Cash Transfers and Contraceptive Use: A Regression Discontinuity Analysis.

Authors:  Maria Carolina Velasco; Stavroula A Chrysanthopoulou; Omar Galárraga
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2020-12-06

3.  The Oportunidades conditional cash transfer program: effects on pregnancy and contraceptive use among young rural women in Mexico.

Authors:  Blair G Darney; Marcia R Weaver; Sandra G Sosa-Rubi; Dilys Walker; Edson Servan-Mori; Sarah Prager; Emmanuela Gakidou
Journal:  Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2013-12

4.  Unconditional Government Social Cash Transfer in Africa Does not Increase Fertility.

Authors:  Tia Palermo; Sudhanshu Handa; Amber Peterman; Leah Prencipe; David Seidenfeld
Journal:  J Popul Econ       Date:  2016-04-29

5.  What makes Health Demand-Side Financing Schemes Work in Low-and Middle-Income Countries? A Realist Review.

Authors:  Saji S Gopalan; Ashis Das; Ronald Mutasa
Journal:  J Public Health Res       Date:  2014-12-02

6.  Role of cash in conditional cash transfer programmes for child health, growth, and development: an analysis of Mexico's Oportunidades.

Authors:  Lia C H Fernald; Paul J Gertler; Lynnette M Neufeld
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 202.731

7.  Relationship between Receipt of a Social Protection Grant for a Child and Second Pregnancy Rates among South African Women: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Molly Rosenberg; Audrey Pettifor; Nadia Nguyen; Daniel Westreich; Jacob Bor; Till Bärnighausen; Paul Mee; Rhian Twine; Stephen Tollman; Kathleen Kahn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Would you test for 5000 Shillings? HIV risk and willingness to accept HIV testing in Tanzania.

Authors:  Jan Ostermann; Derek S Brown; Axel Mühlbacher; Bernard Njau; Nathan Thielman
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2015-08-19

9.  Cash transfers for HIV prevention: considering their potential.

Authors:  Lori Heise; Brian Lutz; Meghna Ranganathan; Charlotte Watts
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 5.396

Review 10.  Conditional and Unconditional Cash Transfers to Improve Use of Contraception in Low and Middle Income Countries: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  M E Khan; Avishek Hazra; Aastha Kant; Moazzam Ali
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2016-11-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.