OBJECTIVES: To compare 3 measures of adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) in HIV-positive adults receiving free treatment from a public hospital in Malawi. METHODS: Adherence was measured over 1 month by pill count (PC), self-report, and a medication event monitoring system RESULTS: Data from 80 patients were available for analysis. The mean patient age was 38.6 years, and 57.5% were female. The mean adherence using the MEMS cap (MC) was 88.1%. Forty-six (57.5%) patients had MC adherence > or =95%, and 13 (16.2%) had <80% adherence. There was no association between MC adherence and time on ART. Mean PC adherence was 98.6%, significantly higher than MC adherence (P < 0.001). There was no clear relation between PC and MC adherence: 4 patients had MC adherence <20% but PC adherence of 100%. Self-reports of missing a tablet did not correlate with poor MC adherence. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows the complexities of measuring adherence and probable overestimation of adherence by PC and self-report. Because these are the main methods used in developing countries, this raises concerns about the development of drug resistance. Improved methods are needed to detect nonadherence in developing countries, and validation of MC data with drug levels and virologic outcome in this setting is important.
OBJECTIVES: To compare 3 measures of adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) in HIV-positive adults receiving free treatment from a public hospital in Malawi. METHODS: Adherence was measured over 1 month by pill count (PC), self-report, and a medication event monitoring system RESULTS: Data from 80 patients were available for analysis. The mean patient age was 38.6 years, and 57.5% were female. The mean adherence using the MEMS cap (MC) was 88.1%. Forty-six (57.5%) patients had MC adherence > or =95%, and 13 (16.2%) had <80% adherence. There was no association between MC adherence and time on ART. Mean PC adherence was 98.6%, significantly higher than MC adherence (P < 0.001). There was no clear relation between PC and MC adherence: 4 patients had MC adherence <20% but PC adherence of 100%. Self-reports of missing a tablet did not correlate with poor MC adherence. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows the complexities of measuring adherence and probable overestimation of adherence by PC and self-report. Because these are the main methods used in developing countries, this raises concerns about the development of drug resistance. Improved methods are needed to detect nonadherence in developing countries, and validation of MC data with drug levels and virologic outcome in this setting is important.
Authors: Cristian Pop-Eleches; Harsha Thirumurthy; James P Habyarimana; Joshua G Zivin; Markus P Goldstein; Damien de Walque; Leslie MacKeen; Jessica Haberer; Sylvester Kimaiyo; John Sidle; Duncan Ngare; David R Bangsberg Journal: AIDS Date: 2011-03-27 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Matthew O Wiens; Stuart MacLeod; Victor Musiime; Mark Ssenyonga; Ruth Kizza; Sabrina Bakeera-Kitaka; Richard Odoi-Adome; Francis Ssali Journal: Paediatr Drugs Date: 2012-10-01 Impact factor: 3.022
Authors: John Farley; Erin Miller; Andrew Zamani; Vicki Tepper; Chester Morris; Modupe Oyegunle; Maria Lin; Manhattan Charurat; William Blattner Journal: J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic) Date: 2010 Jul-Aug
Authors: John C Chalker; Tenaw Andualem; Lillian N Gitau; Joseph Ntaganira; Celestino Obua; Hailu Tadeg; Paul Waako; Dennis Ross-Degnan Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-02-19 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Ramsey A Lyimo; Jossy van den Boogaard; Elizabeth Msoka; Harm J Hospers; Andre van der Ven; Declare Mushi; Marijn de Bruin Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-02-09 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: David J Bell; Dan Wootton; Mavuto Mukaka; Jacqui Montgomery; Noel Kayange; Phillips Chimpeni; Dyfrig A Hughes; Malcolm E Molyneux; Steve A Ward; Peter A Winstanley; David G Lalloo Journal: Malar J Date: 2009-08-26 Impact factor: 2.979