PURPOSE: We investigated whether cardiac rehabilitation participation increases circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and benefits vasculature in patients already on stable therapy previously shown to augment EPCs and improve endothelial function. METHODS: Forty-six of 50 patients with coronary artery disease completed a 36-session cardiac rehabilitation program: 45 were treated with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) therapy > or = 1 month (average baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol = 81 mg/dL). Mononuclear cells isolated from blood were quantified for EPCs by flow cytometry (CD133/VEGFR-2 cells) and assayed in culture for EPC colony-forming units (CFUs). In 23 patients, EPCs were stained for annexin-V as a marker of apoptosis, and nitrite was measured in blood as an indicator of intravascular nitric oxide. RESULTS: Endothelial progenitor cells increased from 35 +/- 5 to 63 +/- 10 cells/mL, and EPC-CFUs increased from 0.9 +/- 0.2 to 3.1 +/- 0.6 per well (both P < .01), but 11 patients had no increase in either measure. Those patients whose EPCs increased from baseline showed significant increases in nitrite and reduction in annexin-V staining (both P < .01) versus no change in patients without increase in EPCs. Over the course of the program, EPCs increased prior to increase in nitrite in the blood. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac rehabilitation in patients receiving stable statin therapy and with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at goal increases EPC number, EPC survival, and endothelial differentiation potential, associated with increased nitric oxide in the blood. Although this response was observed in most patients, a significant minority showed neither EPC mobilization nor increased nitric oxide in the blood.
PURPOSE: We investigated whether cardiac rehabilitation participation increases circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and benefits vasculature in patients already on stable therapy previously shown to augment EPCs and improve endothelial function. METHODS: Forty-six of 50 patients with coronary artery disease completed a 36-session cardiac rehabilitation program: 45 were treated with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) therapy > or = 1 month (average baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol = 81 mg/dL). Mononuclear cells isolated from blood were quantified for EPCs by flow cytometry (CD133/VEGFR-2 cells) and assayed in culture for EPC colony-forming units (CFUs). In 23 patients, EPCs were stained for annexin-V as a marker of apoptosis, and nitrite was measured in blood as an indicator of intravascular nitric oxide. RESULTS: Endothelial progenitor cells increased from 35 +/- 5 to 63 +/- 10 cells/mL, and EPC-CFUs increased from 0.9 +/- 0.2 to 3.1 +/- 0.6 per well (both P < .01), but 11 patients had no increase in either measure. Those patients whose EPCs increased from baseline showed significant increases in nitrite and reduction in annexin-V staining (both P < .01) versus no change in patients without increase in EPCs. Over the course of the program, EPCs increased prior to increase in nitrite in the blood. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac rehabilitation in patients receiving stable statin therapy and with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at goal increases EPC number, EPC survival, and endothelial differentiation potential, associated with increased nitric oxide in the blood. Although this response was observed in most patients, a significant minority showed neither EPC mobilization nor increased nitric oxide in the blood.
Authors: Amr Alkarmi; Dick H J Thijssen; Khalled Albouaini; N Timothy Cable; D Jay Wright; Daniel J Green; Ellen A Dawson Journal: Sports Med Date: 2010-06-01 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Nathan T Jenkins; Sarah Witkowski; Espen E Spangenburg; James M Hagberg Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2009-08-28 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Delong Liu; Alexander P Glaser; Sushmitha Patibandla; Arnon Blum; Peter J Munson; J Philip McCoy; Nalini Raghavachari; Richard O Cannon Journal: Cytotherapy Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 5.414
Authors: R Schier; R El-Zein; A Cortes; M Liu; M Collins; N Rafat; P Teschendorf; Hua-Kang Wu; J Heymach; R Mehran; B Riedel Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2014-05-31 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Ernst E van Faassen; Soheyl Bahrami; Martin Feelisch; Neil Hogg; Malte Kelm; Daniel B Kim-Shapiro; Andrey V Kozlov; Haitao Li; Jon O Lundberg; Ron Mason; Hans Nohl; Tienush Rassaf; Alexandre Samouilov; Anny Slama-Schwok; Sruti Shiva; Anatoly F Vanin; Eddie Weitzberg; Jay Zweier; Mark T Gladwin Journal: Med Res Rev Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 12.944
Authors: Dick H J Thijssen; Andrew J Maiorana; Gerry O'Driscoll; Nigel T Cable; Maria T E Hopman; Daniel J Green Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2009-11-27 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Aditi Desai; Alexander Glaser; Delong Liu; Nalini Raghavachari; Arnon Blum; Gloria Zalos; Margaret Lippincott; J Philip McCoy; Peter J Munson; Michael A Solomon; Robert L Danner; Richard O Cannon Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Olujimi A Ajijola; Chunming Dong; Edward E Herderick; Qi Ma; Pascal J Goldschmidt-Clermont; Zhen Yan Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 8.401