OBJECTIVE: To derive population norms on the Malayalam adaptation of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (M-ACE) and the inclusive Malayalam mini mental state examination (M-MMSE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Education-stratified norms were obtained on randomly selected cognitively unimpaired community elders (n = 519). RESULTS: Valid data on norms was available on 488 subjects (age 68.5 +/- 7.1 and education 7.9 +/- 5.4). Education and age, but not gender had a significant effect on both M-ACE and M-MMSE. When compared to the effect of age, the effect of education was sevenfold more on the M-ACE and ninefold more on the M-MMSE. The mean composite score on the M-ACE (and the M-MMSE) was 42.8 +/- 9.8 (14.9 +/- 3.1) for those with 0 (n = 72), 55.9 +/- 12.5 (19.7 +/- 4.1) with 1-4 (n = 96), 62.6 +/- 11.4 (21.9 +/- 3.7) with 5-8 (n = 81), 77 +/- 10.2 (25.7 +/- 2.4) with 9-12 (n = 136) and 83.4 +/- 7.2 (26.7 +/- 1.6) with > 12 (n = 103) years of formal education. CONCLUSIONS: Education has the most potent effect on performance on both M-ACE and M-MMSE in the Indian cohort. Education-stratified scores on the M-ACE and the M-MMSE, will provide a more appropriate means of establishing the cognitive status of patients. It is also our feeling that these cut-off scores will be useful across India.
OBJECTIVE: To derive population norms on the Malayalam adaptation of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (M-ACE) and the inclusive Malayalam mini mental state examination (M-MMSE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Education-stratified norms were obtained on randomly selected cognitively unimpaired community elders (n = 519). RESULTS: Valid data on norms was available on 488 subjects (age 68.5 +/- 7.1 and education 7.9 +/- 5.4). Education and age, but not gender had a significant effect on both M-ACE and M-MMSE. When compared to the effect of age, the effect of education was sevenfold more on the M-ACE and ninefold more on the M-MMSE. The mean composite score on the M-ACE (and the M-MMSE) was 42.8 +/- 9.8 (14.9 +/- 3.1) for those with 0 (n = 72), 55.9 +/- 12.5 (19.7 +/- 4.1) with 1-4 (n = 96), 62.6 +/- 11.4 (21.9 +/- 3.7) with 5-8 (n = 81), 77 +/- 10.2 (25.7 +/- 2.4) with 9-12 (n = 136) and 83.4 +/- 7.2 (26.7 +/- 1.6) with > 12 (n = 103) years of formal education. CONCLUSIONS: Education has the most potent effect on performance on both M-ACE and M-MMSE in the Indian cohort. Education-stratified scores on the M-ACE and the M-MMSE, will provide a more appropriate means of establishing the cognitive status of patients. It is also our feeling that these cut-off scores will be useful across India.
Authors: R Sheelakumari; C Kesavadas; T Varghese; R M Sreedharan; B Thomas; J Verghese; P S Mathuranath Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-08-24 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Joe Verghese; Mohan L Noone; Beena Johnson; Anne F Ambrose; Cuiling Wang; Herman Buschke; Vayyattu G Pradeep; Kizhakkaniyakath Abdul Salam; Kunnukatil S Shaji; Pavagada S Mathuranath Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-10-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: P S Mathuranath; P Joseph Cherian; Robert Mathew; Suresh Kumar; Annamma George; Aley Alexander; Neelima Ranjith; P S Sarma Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: P S Mathuranath; Annamma George; Neelima Ranjith; Sunita Justus; M Suresh Kumar; Ramsekhar Menon; P Shankara Sarma; Joe Verghese Journal: Neurol India Date: 2012 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.117