Literature DB >> 17557102

Improving the success rate of proteome analysis by modeling protein-abundance distributions and experimental designs.

Jan Eriksson1, David Fenyö.   

Abstract

Truly comprehensive proteome analysis is highly desirable in systems biology and biomarker discovery efforts. But complete proteome characterization has been hindered by the dynamic range and detection sensitivity of experimental designs, which are not adequate to the very wide range of protein abundances. Experimental designs for comprehensive analytical efforts involve separation followed by mass spectrometry-based identification of digested proteins. Because results are generally reported as a collection of identifications with no information on the fraction of the proteome that was missed, they are difficult to evaluate and potentially misleading. Here we address this problem by taking a holistic view of the experimental design and using computer simulations to estimate the success rate for any given experiment. Our approach demonstrates that simple changes in typical experimental designs can enhance the success rate of proteome analysis by five- to tenfold.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17557102     DOI: 10.1038/nbt1315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Biotechnol        ISSN: 1087-0156            Impact factor:   54.908


  25 in total

1.  Generic comparison of protein inference engines.

Authors:  Manfred Claassen; Lukas Reiter; Michael O Hengartner; Joachim M Buhmann; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Isolation and proteomic characterization of the mouse sperm acrosomal matrix.

Authors:  Benoit Guyonnet; Masoud Zabet-Moghaddam; Susan SanFrancisco; Gail A Cornwall
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Modeling mass spectrometry-based protein analysis.

Authors:  Jan Eriksson; David Fenyö
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2011

4.  Multiple reaction monitoring assay based on conventional liquid chromatography and electrospray ionization for simultaneous monitoring of multiple cerebrospinal fluid biomarker candidates for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Yong Seok Choi; Kelvin H Lee
Journal:  Arch Pharm Res       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 4.946

5.  Protein identification false discovery rates for very large proteomics data sets generated by tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Lukas Reiter; Manfred Claassen; Sabine P Schrimpf; Marko Jovanovic; Alexander Schmidt; Joachim M Buhmann; Michael O Hengartner; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 6.  Methods, Tools and Current Perspectives in Proteogenomics.

Authors:  Kelly V Ruggles; Karsten Krug; Xiaojing Wang; Karl R Clauser; Jing Wang; Samuel H Payne; David Fenyö; Bing Zhang; D R Mani
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 7.  Inference and validation of protein identifications.

Authors:  Manfred Claassen
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 8.  Proteomics of plant pathogenic fungi.

Authors:  Raquel González-Fernández; Elena Prats; Jesús V Jorrín-Novo
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-05-27

9.  Performance metrics for liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry systems in proteomics analyses.

Authors:  Paul A Rudnick; Karl R Clauser; Lisa E Kilpatrick; Dmitrii V Tchekhovskoi; Pedatsur Neta; Niksa Blonder; Dean D Billheimer; Ronald K Blackman; David M Bunk; Helene L Cardasis; Amy-Joan L Ham; Jacob D Jaffe; Christopher R Kinsinger; Mehdi Mesri; Thomas A Neubert; Birgit Schilling; David L Tabb; Tony J Tegeler; Lorenzo Vega-Montoto; Asokan Mulayath Variyath; Mu Wang; Pei Wang; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Lisa J Zimmerman; Steven A Carr; Susan J Fisher; Bradford W Gibson; Amanda G Paulovich; Fred E Regnier; Henry Rodriguez; Cliff Spiegelman; Paul Tempst; Daniel C Liebler; Stephen E Stein
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  Proteome coverage prediction with infinite Markov models.

Authors:  Manfred Claassen; Ruedi Aebersold; Joachim M Buhmann
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.