Literature DB >> 17556129

The selection of L5 versus S1 in long fusions for adult idiopathic scoliosis.

Ganesh Swamy1, Sigurd H Berven, David S Bradford.   

Abstract

The treatment of adult spinal deformities often involves long thoracolumbar fusions into the lower lumbar spine, raising the debate of selecting L5 or S1 as the caudal extent of the fusion. The presence of significant deformity or degenerative pathologic findings at L5-S1 mandates fusion to the sacrum. Fusion to the sacrum is of larger magnitude than fusion to L5 and introduces a higher surgical complication rate. Advantages of ending the fusion at L5 include preservation of motion, avoiding the high complication rate associated with fusion to the sacrum, and possibly avoiding a second operation. Complications with fusion to L5 include possible loss of fixation and subsequent disc degeneration at L5-S1, however, leading to possible pain and loss of sagittal balance and the need for revision surgery. To date, the functional consequences of an open disc space beneath long constructs remain poorly defined, and there is no firm evidence in the literature guiding the surgeon's choice. The issues and evidence guiding the decision to fuse to L5 or S1 are examined in this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17556129     DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2007.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am        ISSN: 1042-3680            Impact factor:   2.509


  5 in total

1.  An international consensus on the appropriate evaluation and treatment for adults with spinal deformity.

Authors:  Sigurd H Berven; Steven J Kamper; Niccole M Germscheid; Benny Dahl; Christopher I Shaffrey; Lawrence G Lenke; Stephen J Lewis; Kenneth M Cheung; Ahmet Alanay; Manabu Ito; David W Polly; Yong Qiu; Marinus de Kleuver
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  L5-S1 disc degeneration and the anatomic parameters of the iliac crest: imaging study.

Authors:  Yong-Li Wang; Xiang-Yang Wang; Bi-Dong Fang; Yong-Long Chi; Hua-Zi Xu; Li-Jun Wu; Zhong-Ke Lin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Selecting caudal fusion levels: 2 year functional and stiffness outcomes with matched pairs analysis in multilevel fusion to L5 versus S1.

Authors:  Alan H Daniels; Heiko Koller; Shannon L Hiratzka; Michael Mayer; Oliver Meier; Alec Gabriel Contag; Adam E M Eltorai; Jayme Hiratzka; D Kojo Hamilton; Christopher I Shaffrey; Justin S Smith; Shay Bess; Eric O Klineberg; Christopher P Ames; Virginie Lafage; Breton Line; Frank J Schwab; Robert A Hart; International Spine Study Group
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Comparison of long fusion terminating at L5 versus the sacrum in treating adult spinal deformity: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fei Jia; Guodong Wang; Xiaoyang Liu; Tao Li; Jianmin Sun
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  [Risk factors analysis of coronal imbalance after posterior long-level fixation and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis].

Authors:  Xiaojian Niu; Sizhen Yang; Ying Zhang; Hao Qiu; Wugui Chen; Chiyu Zhou; Tongwei Chu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-04-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.