AIM: To assess whether computed tomography colonography (CTC) is a viable alternative to colonoscopy or double contrast barium enema in the follow-up of patients after diverticulitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty patients underwent CTC followed immediately by colonoscopy. Results were blinded to the examiners. Findings of diverticular disease and patient acceptance were evaluated. RESULTS: Bowel preparation and distension were good in the majority of CTC and colonoscopy examinations. Diverticular disease was found in 96% of patients at CTC and in 90% at colonoscopy. The rate of agreement between CTC and colonoscopy for diverticular findings in the sigmoid colon was good (kappa=0.64). No complications were seen. Patients found colonoscopy more uncomfortable (p<0.03), more painful (p<0.001), and more difficult (p<0.01) than CTC. Of the patients favouring one examination, 74% preferred CTC. CONCLUSION: CTC appears to have a better diagnostic potential for imaging of diverticular disease-specific findings, when compared with colonoscopy. Also, CTC was less uncomfortable and was preferred by a majority of patients. CTC seems to be a reasonable alternative in follow-up of patients with symptomatic diverticular disease.
AIM: To assess whether computed tomography colonography (CTC) is a viable alternative to colonoscopy or double contrast barium enema in the follow-up of patients after diverticulitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty patients underwent CTC followed immediately by colonoscopy. Results were blinded to the examiners. Findings of diverticular disease and patient acceptance were evaluated. RESULTS: Bowel preparation and distension were good in the majority of CTC and colonoscopy examinations. Diverticular disease was found in 96% of patients at CTC and in 90% at colonoscopy. The rate of agreement between CTC and colonoscopy for diverticular findings in the sigmoid colon was good (kappa=0.64). No complications were seen. Patients found colonoscopy more uncomfortable (p<0.03), more painful (p<0.001), and more difficult (p<0.01) than CTC. Of the patients favouring one examination, 74% preferred CTC. CONCLUSION: CTC appears to have a better diagnostic potential for imaging of diverticular disease-specific findings, when compared with colonoscopy. Also, CTC was less uncomfortable and was preferred by a majority of patients. CTC seems to be a reasonable alternative in follow-up of patients with symptomatic diverticular disease.
Authors: G A Binda; R Cuomo; A Laghi; R Nascimbeni; A Serventi; D Bellini; P Gervaz; B Annibale Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 3.781
Authors: George Ou; Greg Rosenfeld; Jacqueline Brown; Nathan Chan; Thomas Hong; Howard Lim; Brian Bressler Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Lidewine Daniels; Çağdaş Ünlü; Thomas R de Wijkerslooth; Hein B Stockmann; Ernst J Kuipers; Marja A Boermeester; Evelien Dekker Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-12-04 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: D R McArthur; H Mehrzad; R Patel; J Dadds; A Pallan; S S Karandikar; S Roy-Choudhury Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-09-02 Impact factor: 5.315