Literature DB >> 17555835

Visual verbal working memory processing may be interfered by previously seen faces.

Andres A Gonzalez-Garrido1, Julieta Ramos-Loyo, Fabiola R Gomez-Velazquez, Marina Alvelais Alarcón, Juan Moises de la Serna Tuya.   

Abstract

Processing and maintenance in working memory involve active attention allocation; consequently, it is possible that a recognition process could interfere with the performance of highly demanding working memory tasks. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded while fourteen healthy male adults performed a visual verbal dual working memory task. Three conditions were examined: A) reference (with no preceding stimuli); B) happy, angry or neutral faces presented 250 ms prior to task onset for 30 ms; and, C) visual noise control condition. Behavioral results showed that reaction times were significantly longer in the condition preceded by the presentation of faces, regardless of their emotional content. ERPs showed a predominantly right temporo-occipital negative component at around 170 ms during conditions B and C (higher amplitude in B), which probably reflects the pre-categorical structural encoding of the face. Succeeding task-onset, an early positive right temporo-parietal component (P380) appeared during condition B, probably reflecting a delayed reallocation of working memory attentional resources to carry out the task requirements. Afterwards, two other main fronto-parietal components were observed in the three conditions: a positive wave that peaked at around 410 ms, and a subsequent negative component (N585). This latter waveform reached a significantly higher amplitude during the reference condition (A) and was interpreted as mirroring the phonologic-lexical manipulation of the stimuli in working memory. These results suggest that early face detection could induce an attentional decrement that interfere a subsequent visual verbal working memory task performance. They also suggest that while face detection and facial emotional content analysis might be parallel processes, they are not onset-synchronized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17555835     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  2 in total

Review 1.  The impact of affective information on working memory: A pair of meta-analytic reviews of behavioral and neuroimaging evidence.

Authors:  Susanne Schweizer; Ajay B Satpute; Shir Atzil; Andy P Field; Caitlin Hitchcock; Melissa Black; Lisa Feldman Barrett; Tim Dalgleish
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Sex Differences in Emotion Recognition and Working Memory Tasks.

Authors:  Rahmi Saylik; Evren Raman; Andre J Szameitat
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-06-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.