Literature DB >> 17555217

Fishing the line near marine reserves in single and multispecies fisheries.

Julie B Kellner1, Irene Tetreault, Steven D Gaines, Roger M Nisbet.   

Abstract

Throughout the world "fishing the line" is a frequent harvesting tactic in communities where no-take marine reserves are designated. This practice of concentrating fishing effort at the boundary of a marine reserve is predicated upon the principle of spillover, the net export of stock from the marine reserve to the surrounding unprotected waters. We explore the consequences and optimality of fishing the line using a spatially explicit theoretical model. We show that fishing the line: (1) is part of the optimal effort distribution near no-take marine reserves with mobile species regardless of the cooperation level among harvesters; (2) has a significant impact on the spatial patterns of catch per unit effort (CPUE) and fish density both within and outside of the reserve; and (3) can enhance total population size and catch simultaneously under a limited set of conditions for overexploited populations. Additionally, we explore the consequences of basing the spatial distribution of fishing effort for a multispecies fishery upon the optimality of the most mobile species that exhibits the greatest spillover. Our results show that the intensity of effort allocated to fishing the line should instead be based upon more intermediate rates of mobility within the targeted community. We conclude with a comparison between model predictions and empirical findings from a density gradient study of two important game fish in the vicinity of a no-take marine-life refuge on Santa Catalina Island, California (USA). These results reveal the need for empirical studies to account for harvester behavior and suggest that the implications of spatial discontinuities such as fishing the line should be incorporated into marine-reserve design.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17555217     DOI: 10.1890/05-1845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  30 in total

1.  The good, the bad and the ugly of marine reserves for fishery yields.

Authors:  Giulio A De Leo; Fiorenza Micheli
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Differential movement and movement bias models for marine protected areas.

Authors:  Jessica Langebrake; Louise Riotte-Lambert; Craig W Osenberg; Patrick De Leenheer
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Detecting larval export from marine reserves.

Authors:  R A Pelc; R R Warner; S D Gaines; C B Paris
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Incorporating biogeography into evaluations of the Channel Islands marine reserve network.

Authors:  Scott L Hamilton; Jennifer E Caselle; Dan P Malone; Mark H Carr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management.

Authors:  Steven D Gaines; Crow White; Mark H Carr; Stephen R Palumbi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A meta-analysis reveals edge effects within marine protected areas.

Authors:  Sarah Ohayon; Itai Granot; Jonathan Belmaker
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 15.460

7.  Relative impacts of adult movement, larval dispersal and harvester movement on the effectiveness of reserve networks.

Authors:  Arnaud Grüss; David M Kaplan; Deborah R Hart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparison of marine spatial planning methods in Madagascar demonstrates value of alternative approaches.

Authors:  Thomas F Allnutt; Timothy R McClanahan; Serge Andréfouët; Merrill Baker; Erwann Lagabrielle; Caleb McClennen; Andry J M Rakotomanjaka; Tantely F Tianarisoa; Reg Watson; Claire Kremen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Recent expansion of marine protected areas matches with home range of grey reef sharks.

Authors:  Lucas Bonnin; David Mouillot; Germain Boussarie; William D Robbins; Jeremy J Kiszka; Laurent Dagorn; Laurent Vigliola
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Fishers' behaviour in response to the implementation of a Marine Protected Area.

Authors:  Bárbara Horta e Costa; Marisa I Batista; Leonel Gonçalves; Karim Erzini; Jennifer E Caselle; Henrique N Cabral; Emanuel J Gonçalves
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.