Literature DB >> 17554857

Ranking poses in structure-based lead discovery and optimization: current trends in scoring function development.

Ramkumar Rajamani1, Andrew C Good.   

Abstract

The ability to accurately predict the potency of ligand binding to its intended target prior to synthesis is of significant value in the drug-discovery paradigm. The protocols designed to this end follow a two-step process. First, ligands are docked into the active site of interest, and then the resulting interactions at the target are scored. Scoring functions form the key component in this process, providing a quantitative measure of fit quality. There is an abundance of new research in the field of scoring function design, from incorporation of novel descriptors (derived from first principles or empirical analysis) to function redesign based on improved data set handling. This article provides a brief overview on the state-of-the-art developments in the field, with particular reference to their performance in relation to expected outcomes.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17554857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel        ISSN: 1367-6733


  27 in total

Review 1.  Flexibility and binding affinity in protein-ligand, protein-protein and multi-component protein interactions: limitations of current computational approaches.

Authors:  Pierre Tuffery; Philippe Derreumaux
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Design of a semisolid vaginal microbicide gel by relating composition to properties and performance.

Authors:  Alamelu Mahalingam; Eric Smith; Judit Fabian; Festo R Damian; Jennifer J Peters; Meredith R Clark; David R Friend; David F Katz; Patrick F Kiser
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Scoring and lessons learned with the CSAR benchmark using an improved iterative knowledge-based scoring function.

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Optimization of CAMD techniques 3. Virtual screening enrichment studies: a help or hindrance in tool selection?

Authors:  Andrew C Good; Tudor I Oprea
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 5.  Biomolecular simulation and modelling: status, progress and prospects.

Authors:  Marc W van der Kamp; Katherine E Shaw; Christopher J Woods; Adrian J Mulholland
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  The use of docking-based comparative intermolecular contacts analysis to identify optimal docking conditions within glucokinase and to discover of new GK activators.

Authors:  Mutasem O Taha; Maha Habash; Mohammad A Khanfar
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Effect of explicit water molecules on ligand-binding affinities calculated with the MM/GBSA approach.

Authors:  Paulius Mikulskis; Samuel Genheden; Ulf Ryde
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 1.810

8.  Assessing protein-ligand interaction scoring functions with the CASF-2013 benchmark.

Authors:  Yan Li; Minyi Su; Zhihai Liu; Jie Li; Jie Liu; Li Han; Renxiao Wang
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 9.  Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Prediction of potency of protease inhibitors using free energy simulations with polarizable quantum mechanics-based ligand charges and a hybrid water model.

Authors:  Debananda Das; Yasuhiro Koh; Yasushi Tojo; Arun K Ghosh; Hiroaki Mitsuya
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.