Literature DB >> 17553186

Combined approach tympanoplasty for cholesteatoma: impact of middle-ear endoscopy.

M Barakate1, I Bottrill.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were (1) to explore whether the experience at the Radcliffe Infirmary (Oxford, UK) supported the use of combined approach tympanoplasty for cholesteatoma, by determining the rate of disease at subsequent surgery, and (2) to assess whether this rate differed from findings reported elsewhere in the literature, possibly due to the effect of using an oto-endoscope. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case review, with data entered prospectively for operations performed by a single surgeon.
SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital. PATIENTS: Between January 1998 and December 2004 inclusive, 66 patients underwent 68 primary procedures, with data available for all 'second looks'.
INTERVENTIONS: Diagnostic and therapeutic operations for cholesteatoma were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All patients in this study attended follow up and underwent a second look operation, during which the rate of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma was determined. An oto-endoscope was used at all primary and subsequent surgery.
RESULTS: The mean interval between the first and second combined approach tympanoplasty procedures was 16 months, and that between the second and third such procedures was 19 months (10 patients). One patient underwent a fourth combined approach tympanoplasty procedure, 17 months after a third such procedure. The rate of cholesteatoma at second combined approach tympanoplasty was 20.6 per cent (14/68); this was judged to be residual in 10 ears (14.7 per cent) and to be recurrent, with the redevelopment of retraction pockets, in four ears (5.9 per cent). The rate of cholesteatoma at third combined approach tympanoplasty was 20 per cent (two of 10); of these two, one patient had a small pearl in the middle ear removed with the aid of a potassium titanyl phosphate laser. There was no disease present in one patient at a fourth combined approach tympanoplasty. Only four patients required a modified radical mastoidectomy.
CONCLUSION: Cholesteatoma remains a disease with significant morbidity. Endoscope-assisted surgery may decrease the morbidity of second look surgery and may improve the clearance of disease in appropriately selected patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17553186     DOI: 10.1017/S0022215107009346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laryngol Otol        ISSN: 0022-2151            Impact factor:   1.469


  11 in total

1.  Temporary removal of the posterior bony canal wall with reconstruction using microplate osteosynthesis in cholesteatoma surgery: a case series and description of the technique.

Authors:  Karen Van der Gucht; Vincent Van Rompaey; Olivier Vanderveken; Paul Van de Heyning; Jos Claes
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Imaging anatomy of the retrotympanum: variants and their surgical implications.

Authors:  Christian Burd; Irumee Pai; Stephen Connor
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Systematic review of outcomes following observational and operative endoscopic middle ear surgery.

Authors:  Elliott D Kozin; Shawn Gulati; Alyson B Kaplan; Ashton E Lehmann; Aaron K Remenschneider; Lukas D Landegger; Michael S Cohen; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  The HD-Panoramic Visualization System: a new visualization system for ENT surgery.

Authors:  G Strauss; N Bahrami; M Hofer; E Dittrich; M Strauss; A Dietz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  [A new visualization device for ENT surgery : the panoramic visualization system (HD-PVS)].

Authors:  G Strauss; M Hofer; N Bahrami; E Dittrich; M Strauss; A Dietz
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 6.  A review of current progress in acquired cholesteatoma management.

Authors:  Chin-Lung Kuo; Wen-Huei Liao; An-Suey Shiao
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 7.  Results of endoscopic middle ear surgery for cholesteatoma treatment: a systematic review.

Authors:  L Presutti; F M Gioacchini; M Alicandri-Ciufelli; D Villari; D Marchioni
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.124

8.  Extending otology services to rural settings: Value of endoscopic ear surgery.

Authors:  Abubakar Danjuma Salisu; Yasir Nuhu Jibril
Journal:  Ann Afr Med       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

9.  Comparison of Endoscopic Tympanoplasty to Microscopic Tympanoplasty.

Authors:  Nayeon Choi; Yangseop Noh; Woori Park; Jung Joo Lee; Sunhyun Yook; Ji Eun Choi; Won-Ho Chung; Yang-Sun Cho; Sung Hwa Hong; Il Joon Moon
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 3.372

Review 10.  Endoscopic ear surgery.

Authors:  Ismet Emrah Emre; Cemal Cingi; Nuray Bayar Muluk; João Flávio Nogueira
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2019-12-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.