Literature DB >> 17553022

Evaluating the social and economic impact of community-based prenatal care.

Mary E Cramer1, Li-Wu Chen, Sara Roberts, Dorothea Clute.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This article describes the evaluation and findings of a community-based prenatal care program, Omaha Healthy Start (OHS), designed to reduce local racial disparities in birth outcomes.
DESIGN: This evaluative study used a comparative descriptive design, and Targeting Outcomes of Programs was the conceptual framework for evaluation. SAMPLE: The evaluation followed 3 groups for 2 years: OHS birth mothers (N=79; N=157); non-OHS participant birth mothers (N=746; N=774); and Douglas County birth mothers (N=7,962; N=7,987). MEASUREMENT: OHS provided case management, home visits, screening, referral, transportation, and health education to participants. Program outcome measures included low birth weight, infant mortality, adequacy of care, trimester of care, and costs of care.
RESULTS: OHS birth outcomes improved during year 2, and there was a 31% cost saving in the average hospital expenditure compared with the nonparticipant groups. Preliminary evaluative analysis indicates that prenatal case management and community outreach can improve birth outcomes for minority women, while producing cost savings.
CONCLUSIONS: Further prospective study is needed to document trends over a longer period of time regarding the relationship between community-based case management programs for minority populations, birth outcomes, and costs of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17553022     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2007.00641.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nurs        ISSN: 0737-1209            Impact factor:   1.462


  8 in total

Review 1.  Measuring the impact and outcomes of maternal child health federal programs.

Authors:  Yhenneko J Taylor; Mary A Nies
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-07

2.  Healthy start program and feto-infant morbidity outcomes: evaluation of program effectiveness.

Authors:  Hamisu M Salihu; Alfred K Mbah; Delores Jeffers; Amina P Alio; Lo Berry
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2008-08-09

3.  Understanding prenatal health care for American Indian women in a Northern Plains tribe.

Authors:  Jessica D Hanson
Journal:  J Transcult Nurs       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 1.959

Review 4.  Medicaid and preterm birth and low birth weight: the last two decades.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Anum; Sheldon M Retchin; Jerome F Strauss
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Despite an overall decline in U.S. infant mortality rates, the Black/White disparity persists: recent trends and future projections.

Authors:  Shondra Loggins; Flavia Cristina Drumond Andrade
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2014-02

6.  Association between perinatal medical expenses and a waiver to increase Florida healthy start services within Florida medicaid programs: 1998 to 2006.

Authors:  Stephanie A S Staras; John A Kairalla; Wei Hou; William M Sappenfield; Daniel R Thompson; Deepa Ranka; Elizabeth A Shenkman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-11

7.  Societal Valorisation of New Knowledge to Improve Perinatal Health: Time to Act.

Authors:  Eric A P Steegers; Mary E Barker; Régine P M Steegers-Theunissen; Michelle A Williams
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.980

8.  Is Timing of Enrollment Associated with Birth Outcomes? Findings from a Healthy Start Program in Kansas.

Authors:  Kyrah K Brown; Candace Johnson; Michele Spainhower; Nicole Fox Phillips; J'Vonnah Maryman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.