OBJECTIVE: To determine the psychometric properties of the Academic Medical Center (AMC) Linear Disability Scale (ALDS) item bank in a population of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: 129 patients with RA completed the ALDS and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at baseline, and after 8 and 16 weeks of anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha treatment. Disease activity assessments at these timepoints included serum levels of C-reactive protein, Disease Activity Score 28, morning stiffness, and visual analog scales for global disease activity and fatigue. RESULTS: Reliability of the ALDS was excellent (homogeneity, Cronbach's alpha = 0.95; test-retest, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.93). The ALDS results at baseline were strongly correlated with the HAQ-DI (r = -0.75). With regard to known group validity, both instruments discriminated between higher and lower disease activity (ALDS, p < 0.0001; HAQ-DI, p = 0.002) and between non-, moderate, and good responders (ALDS, p = 0.002; HAQ-DI, p < 0.0001), indicating that both instruments differentiate between groups. The ALDS was moderately to highly responsive to changes between baseline and after 8 weeks and 16 weeks of treatment (standardized response mean, range = 0.71-1.19). No substantial floor or ceiling effects were found. CONCLUSION: Our results show that the ALDS is a promising new instrument, with at least equivalent psychometric properties compared to the HAQ-DI. Advantages of the ALDS item bank are its linear structure and an item bank that can be adapted depending on the ability level of the patient.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the psychometric properties of the Academic Medical Center (AMC) Linear Disability Scale (ALDS) item bank in a population of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: 129 patients with RA completed the ALDS and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at baseline, and after 8 and 16 weeks of anti-tumornecrosis factor-alpha treatment. Disease activity assessments at these timepoints included serum levels of C-reactive protein, Disease Activity Score 28, morning stiffness, and visual analog scales for global disease activity and fatigue. RESULTS: Reliability of the ALDS was excellent (homogeneity, Cronbach's alpha = 0.95; test-retest, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.93). The ALDS results at baseline were strongly correlated with the HAQ-DI (r = -0.75). With regard to known group validity, both instruments discriminated between higher and lower disease activity (ALDS, p < 0.0001; HAQ-DI, p = 0.002) and between non-, moderate, and good responders (ALDS, p = 0.002; HAQ-DI, p < 0.0001), indicating that both instruments differentiate between groups. The ALDS was moderately to highly responsive to changes between baseline and after 8 weeks and 16 weeks of treatment (standardized response mean, range = 0.71-1.19). No substantial floor or ceiling effects were found. CONCLUSION: Our results show that the ALDS is a promising new instrument, with at least equivalent psychometric properties compared to the HAQ-DI. Advantages of the ALDS item bank are its linear structure and an item bank that can be adapted depending on the ability level of the patient.
Authors: Franceline Alkine Frans; Suzanne E van Wijngaarden; Rosemarie Met; Mark J W Koelemay Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-11-15 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: José G M Hofhuis; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Aly Hovingh; Richard L Braam; Lisa van de Braak; Peter E Spronk; Johannes H Rommes Journal: Crit Care Date: 2011-09-14 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Minoesch Min; Anne W Walter; Johan Lim; Filip Eftimov; Camiel Verhamme; Marianne de Visser; Ivo N van Schaik; Rohit Aggarwal; Rob J de Haan; Anneke J van der Kooi; Joost Raaphorst Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2022-08-03 Impact factor: 7.046
Authors: Rosemarie Met; Jim A Reekers; Mark J W Koelemay; Dink A Legemate; Rob J de Haan Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2009-10-12 Impact factor: 3.186