BACKGROUND: Heart rate (HR) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) are currently not considered among common clinical indicators of prognosis in patients referred for heart transplant (Htx). We sought to determine whether an initial hemodynamic profile of HR and SBP could be used to predict outcomes in chronic heart failure patients evaluated for Htx. METHODS: We analyzed the medical records of patients evaluated for Htx and obtained demographic and clinical data collected at the initial transplant clinic visit or inpatient encounter. We assigned patients to groups based on their HR and SBP. Groups were compared after follow-up for differences in freedom from death or Htx. RESULTS: From 1999 to 2003, 400 consecutive patients were considered by the local Htx medical review board. The median duration of follow-up was 26 months (interquartile range 1 to 45 months). Patients with initial >or= 90 beats per minute (bpm) and initial SBP < 100 mmHg ((n = 34) had worse New York Heart Association functional class (p=0.02), lower cardiac output ((p =0.02 ), and greater hyponatremia (>0.001;). These patients were more likely to be hospitalized at the time of referral (p >0.001) and more likely to have experienced death or Htx during follow-up than patients with other hemodynamic profiles (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A hemodynamic profile of HR and SBP can be used with other prognostic indicators to identify high-risk patients at the time of initial evaluation for Htx.
BACKGROUND: Heart rate (HR) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) are currently not considered among common clinical indicators of prognosis in patients referred for heart transplant (Htx). We sought to determine whether an initial hemodynamic profile of HR and SBP could be used to predict outcomes in chronic heart failurepatients evaluated for Htx. METHODS: We analyzed the medical records of patients evaluated for Htx and obtained demographic and clinical data collected at the initial transplant clinic visit or inpatient encounter. We assigned patients to groups based on their HR and SBP. Groups were compared after follow-up for differences in freedom from death or Htx. RESULTS: From 1999 to 2003, 400 consecutive patients were considered by the local Htx medical review board. The median duration of follow-up was 26 months (interquartile range 1 to 45 months). Patients with initial >or= 90 beats per minute (bpm) and initial SBP < 100 mmHg ((n = 34) had worse New York Heart Association functional class (p=0.02), lower cardiac output ((p =0.02 ), and greater hyponatremia (>0.001;). These patients were more likely to be hospitalized at the time of referral (p >0.001) and more likely to have experienced death or Htx during follow-up than patients with other hemodynamic profiles (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A hemodynamic profile of HR and SBP can be used with other prognostic indicators to identify high-risk patients at the time of initial evaluation for Htx.
Authors: William T Abraham; Westby G Fisher; Andrew L Smith; David B Delurgio; Angel R Leon; Evan Loh; Dusan Z Kocovic; Milton Packer; Alfredo L Clavell; David L Hayes; Myrvin Ellestad; Robin J Trupp; Jackie Underwood; Faith Pickering; Cindy Truex; Peggy McAtee; John Messenger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-06-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Michael R Bristow; Leslie A Saxon; John Boehmer; Steven Krueger; David A Kass; Teresa De Marco; Peter Carson; Lorenzo DiCarlo; David DeMets; Bill G White; Dale W DeVries; Arthur M Feldman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-05-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Arthur J Moss; Wojciech Zareba; W Jackson Hall; Helmut Klein; David J Wilber; David S Cannom; James P Daubert; Steven L Higgins; Mary W Brown; Mark L Andrews Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-03-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Gust H Bardy; Kerry L Lee; Daniel B Mark; Jeanne E Poole; Douglas L Packer; Robin Boineau; Michael Domanski; Charles Troutman; Jill Anderson; George Johnson; Steven E McNulty; Nancy Clapp-Channing; Linda D Davidson-Ray; Elizabeth S Fraulo; Daniel P Fishbein; Richard M Luceri; John H Ip Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-01-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lars Gullestad; John Wikstrand; Prakash Deedwania; Ake Hjalmarson; Kenneth Egstrup; Uri Elkayam; Stephen Gottlieb; Andrew Rashkow; Hans Wedel; Georgina Bermann; John Kjekshus Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-01-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: S A Hunt; D W Baker; M H Chin; M P Cinquegrani; A M Feldman; G S Francis; T G Ganiats; S Goldstein; G Gregoratos; M L Jessup; R J Noble; M Packer; M A Silver; L W Stevenson; R J Gibbons; E M Antman; J S Alpert; D P Faxon; V Fuster; G Gregoratos; A K Jacobs; L F Hiratzka; R O Russell; S C Smith Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-12-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M Packer; A J Coats; M B Fowler; H A Katus; H Krum; P Mohacsi; J L Rouleau; M Tendera; A Castaigne; E B Roecker; M K Schultz; D L DeMets Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-05-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Anju Nohria; Sui W Tsang; James C Fang; Eldrin F Lewis; John A Jarcho; Gilbert H Mudge; Lynne W Stevenson Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-05-21 Impact factor: 24.094