Paul Steinbok1. 1. Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, British Columbia's Children's Hospital, British Columbia, Canada. psteinbok@cw.bc.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this report is to review the historical development, current operative techniques, selection criteria, outcomes, and complications of selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) for treatment of spastic cerebral palsy (CP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This review is based on a review of literature and personal observations. RESULTS: SDR has evolved from the 1960s onwards into a standard neurosurgical procedure for spastic CP. There is much variation in the operative technique among surgeons with respect to the level of exposure, electrophysiological guidance, and extent of rhizotomies. Appropriate selection of patients for SDR requires determination that spasticity, not dystonia, is the major disabling hypertonia and that the lower limbs are maximally involved. Positive outcomes have been well demonstrated in the impairment, functional limitations, and disability dimensions, as per the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research Model of Dimensions of the Disabling Process. Complications have been relatively few. CONCLUSIONS: SDR is the procedure of choice for treatment of spasticity in spastic diplegic CP and in selected children with spastic quadriplegic CP. Optimal selection and outcomes are achieved using a multidisciplinary approach.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this report is to review the historical development, current operative techniques, selection criteria, outcomes, and complications of selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) for treatment of spastic cerebral palsy (CP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This review is based on a review of literature and personal observations. RESULTS: SDR has evolved from the 1960s onwards into a standard neurosurgical procedure for spastic CP. There is much variation in the operative technique among surgeons with respect to the level of exposure, electrophysiological guidance, and extent of rhizotomies. Appropriate selection of patients for SDR requires determination that spasticity, not dystonia, is the major disabling hypertonia and that the lower limbs are maximally involved. Positive outcomes have been well demonstrated in the impairment, functional limitations, and disability dimensions, as per the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research Model of Dimensions of the Disabling Process. Complications have been relatively few. CONCLUSIONS: SDR is the procedure of choice for treatment of spasticity in spastic diplegic CP and in selected children with spastic quadriplegic CP. Optimal selection and outcomes are achieved using a multidisciplinary approach.
Authors: J F McLaughlin; K F Bjornson; S J Astley; R M Hays; S A Hoffinger; E A Armantrout; T S Roberts Journal: Dev Med Child Neurol Date: 1994-09 Impact factor: 5.449
Authors: T S Park; G P Vogler; L H Phillips; B A Kaufman; M R Ortman; S M McClure; P E Gaffney Journal: Pediatr Neurosurg Date: 1994 Impact factor: 1.162
Authors: Nelleke G Langerak; Christopher L Vaughan; Edward B Hoffman; Anthony A Figaji; A Graham Fieggen; Jonathan C Peter Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Georges F Vles; Johan S Vles; Maarten van Kleef; Jan van Zundert; Heleen M Staal; Wim E Weber; Lodewijk W van Rhijn; Dan Soudant; H Kerr Graham; Anton J de Louw Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2010-06-22 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: Harshal Ingale; Ismail Ughratdar; Samiul Muquit; Ahmad A Moussa; Michael H Vloeberghs Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2015-11-09 Impact factor: 1.475