| Literature DB >> 17551492 |
F Mozaffari1, C Lindemalm, A Choudhury, H Granstam-Björneklett, I Helander, M Lekander, E Mikaelsson, B Nilsson, M-L Ojutkangas, A Osterborg, L Bergkvist, H Mellstedt.
Abstract
Breast cancer is globally the most common malignancy in women. Her2-targeted monoclonal antibodies are established treatment modalities, and vaccines are in late-stage clinical testing in patients with breast cancer and known to promote tumour-killing through mechanisms like antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. It is therefore increasingly important to study immunological consequences of conventional treatment strategies. In this study, functional tests and four-colour flow cytometry were used to detect natural killer (NK)-cell functions and receptors as well as T-cell signal transduction molecules and intracellular cytokines in preoperative breast cancer patients, and patients who had received adjuvant radiotherapy or adjuvant combined chemo-radiotherapy as well as in age-matched healthy controls. The absolute number of NK cells, the density of NK receptors as well as in vitro quantitation of functional NK cytotoxicity were significantly higher in preoperative patients than the post-treatments group and controls. A similar pattern was seen with regard to T-cell signalling molecules, and preoperative patients produced significantly higher amounts of cytokines in NK and T cells compared to other groups. The results indicate that functions of NK and T cells are well preserved before surgery but decrease following adjuvant therapy, which may speak in favour of early rather than late use of immunotherapeutic agents such as trastuzumab that may depend on intact immune effector functions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17551492 PMCID: PMC2359666 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603840
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Patient characteristics
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Age (range) | (43–75) | (52–80) | (38–69) |
|
| |||
| Mastectomy | — | 3 | 2 |
| Breast conservation | — | 17 | 19 |
|
| |||
| Axillary clearance | 0 | 5 | 14 |
| Sentinel node | 8 | 11 | 7 |
| No axillary dissection | 1 | 4 | 0 |
| Cancer | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| ⩽3 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| 4–8 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| ⩾9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| negative | 8 | 15 | 5 |
| ER+ | 8 | 17 | 14 |
| PR+ | 8 | 10 | 9 |
| HER2+ | 1 | 4 | |
| HER2− | 1 | 6 | |
| Tumour size mm, median (range) | 14 (5–50) | 17 (7–30) | |
| <2 cm | 7 | 13 | 16 |
| ⩾2 cm | 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Adjuvant tamoxifen | 5 | 11 | 15 |
ER+=estrogen receptor positive; HER2+=human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; PR+=progestron receptor positive.
Blood samples were collected 1–3 days before primary surgery.
Blood samples collected after a median time 40 days.
Lymphocyte subsets in patients and healthy donors
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WBC | 6.9 × 103±0.4 (5.6–10 × 103) | 7 × 103±0.5 (4.5–9.2 × 103) | 5.7 × 103±0.3 (4.1–8.5 × 103) | 4.3 × 103±0.2 (3.2–5.3 × 103) |
| Lymphocyte | 2 × 103±0.2 (1.1–3 × 103) | 1.9 × 103±0.1 (1.3–2.2 × 103) | 1.7 × 103±0.1 (0.8–3 × 103) | 1.1 × 103±0.1 (0.6–1.7 × 103) |
| CD3+CD4+
| 858±107 (385–1512) | 782±77 (435–1045) | 625±79 (230–1572) | 336±24 (198–606) |
| CD3+CD8+
| 371±76 (133–885) | 260±38 (102–399) | 244±32 (95–447) | 311±39 (87–476) |
| CD3−CD56+
| 160±32 (49–410) | 293±47 (74–462) | 144±23 (10–428) | 84±12 (7.7–150) |
| IFN- | 2.1±0.6 (0.0–6.5) | 6.2±0.8 (2–9.8) | 3.5±0.6 (0.1–10) | 4.4±0.6 (1–11) |
| LU | 2.6±0.4 (1–6.6) | 13±2.9 (1.9–32.5) | 6.6±1.2 (1.3–19.5) | 4.4±0.6 (0.3–10.4) |
Absolute number (mean±s.e.m.) of WBC, lymphocytes, CD4/CD8T cells, NK cells per microlitre. Frequency of NK cells expressing IFN-γ and NK lytic unit in healthy donors (C) and patient groups before treatment (PT) after radiation therapy (RT) and after radiation+chemotherapy (RT+CT).
The difference between the healthy donors and post-treatment group RT+CT were significant at P⩽ 0.001. The difference between pretreatment and post-RT was significant at P⩽0.05. The difference between PT and RT+CT as well as between RT and RT+CT was significant at P⩽0.001.
The difference between the healthy donors and post-treatment group RT+CT were significant at P⩽0.01. The difference between PT and RT+CT as well as between RT and RT+CT was significant at P⩽0.01.
Healthy donors, PT and RT groups did not differ significantly. All of these groups had significant difference compared to RT+CT (P⩽0.01–0.001).
No significant differences between the patient groups or normal donors.
Elevation in NK cells in PT patients compared to healthy volunteers was significant at P⩽0.05. RT+CT patients had significant decrease compared to healthy donors (P⩽0.05) as well as PT patients (P⩽0.001).
Normal donors had decreased numbers of IFN-γ-positive cells compared to PT (P⩽0.01) as well as RT+CT groups (P⩽0.05). Decrease in RT group compared to PT was also significant (P⩽0.05).
Normal donors had decreased number of lytic units compared to PT and RT groups (P⩽0.01–0.001). Number of lytic units in PT group was elevated compared to RT (P⩽0.05) as well as RT+CT groups (P⩽0.01).
Figure 1Absolute number of CD161+NK cells in normal control donors (C) (n=11), pretreatment (PT) (n=9), post-treatment radiation (RT) (n=20) and post-treatment radiation/chemotherapy (RT+CT) (n=21) treated breast cancer patients. The box represents the 25th to 75th percentiles. The line in the middle of the box represents the median. The top whisker is drawn from the value associated with the 75th to the 90th percentile, the bottom one associated with the 25th to the 10th percentile. The outliers show the highest and lowest 10% of observed values. *P< 0.05, **P< 0.01 and ***P< 0.001.
Figure 2Absolute number of NKB1+NK cells in normal control donors (C) (n=11), pretreatment (PT) (n=9), post-treatment radiation (RT) (n=20) and post-treatment radiation/chemotherapy (RT+CT) (n=21) treated breast cancer patients. For symbols see Figure 1.
Figure 3Flow cytometric analysis of CD4+CD25high and CD4+CD25+ T cells in healthy donors and breast cancer patients. A minimum of 20 000 events in the lymphocyte gate was calculated during acquisition and the analyses was performed on all events calculated. Numbers in the plot indicate the percentage of cells within the respective rectangle.
Figure 4Absolute number of CD25high expressing CD8 T cells in normal control donors (C) (n=11), pretreatment (PT) (n=9), post-treatment radiation (RT) (n=20) and post-treatment radiation/chemotherapy (RT+CT) (n=21) treated breast cancer patients. For symbols see Figure 1.
Figure 5Absolute number of CD28 expressing CD4 T cells in normal control donors (C) (n=11), pretreatment (PT) (n=9), post-treatment radiation (RT) (n=20) and post-treatment radiation/chemotherapy (RT+CT) (n=21) treated breast cancer patients. For symbols see Figure 1.
Figure 6Absolute number of Zap70 expressing CD4 T cells in normal control donors (C) (n=11), pretreatment (PT) (n=9), post-treatment radiation (RT) (n=20) and post-treatment radiation/chemotherapy (RT+CT)(n=21) treated breast cancer patients. For symbols see Figure 1.
Figure 7CD3ζ (A) and Zap70 (B) expressing (MFI) CD8 T cells in normal control donors (C) (n=11), pretreatment (PT) (n=9), post-treatment radiation (RT) (n=20) and post-treatment radiation/chemotherapy (RT+CT) (n=21) treated breast cancer patients. For symbols see Figure 1.
Figure 8Percentage of IFN-γ-producing T cells in normal control donors (C) (n=11), Pretreatment (PT) (n=9), post-treatment radiation (RT) (n=20) and post-treatment radiation/chemotherapy (RT+CT) (n=21) treated breast cancer patients. (A) CD4; (B) CD8 T cells. For symbols see Figure 1.
Figure 9Percentage of IL-4 (A) and IL-2 (B) producing CD4 T cells in normal control donors (C) (n=11), pretreatment (PT) (n=9), post-treatment radiation (RT) (n=20) and post-treatment radiation/chemotherapy (RT+CT)(n=21) treated breast cancer patients. For symbols see Figure 1.