Literature DB >> 17551309

Survival differences observed in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with capecitabine when compared with vinorelbine after pretreatment with anthracycline and taxane.

Sunil Verma1, Nan Soon Wong, Maureen Trudeau, Anil Joy, John Mackey, George Dranitsaris, Mark Clemons.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The optimal treatment of metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with anthracycline and taxane is unknown. Common therapeutic alternatives include capecitabine and vinorelbine. This retrospective chart review compares overall survival following treatment with capecitabine, vinorelbine, or both agents sequentially in this group of women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Electronic patient records and charts of patients who received anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy and subsequently received capecitabine and/or vinorelbine at 3 Canadian cancer centers, between November 1994 and June 2003, were retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTS: A total of 140 patients met the study eligibility criteria: 45 patients received vinorelbine as a single agent and 68 received capecitabine as a single agent. The median duration of therapy was 64 days with vinorelbine and 129 days with capecitabine (P = 0.0012). Median overall survival was 102 days for the vinorelbine group and 188 days for the capecitabine group (P < 0.0001). Survival at 1 year was 15.6% for the vinorelbine group and 28.4% for the capecitabine group (P = 0.017). Twenty-seven patients received both agents sequentially; and in this group, the median duration of therapy was 110 days (87 days with vinorelbine and 138 days with capecitabine), and the median overall survival was 390 days.
CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory analysis suggests that patients with tumors previously treated with both anthracycline and taxane can still obtain significant survival benefit from further chemotherapy. The results indicate that capecitabine may be superior to vinorelbine in this setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17551309     DOI: 10.1097/01.coc.0000258125.97090.3f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  5 in total

Review 1.  Systemic treatment approaches in her2-negative advanced breast cancer-guidance on the guidelines.

Authors:  A A Joy; M Ghosh; R Fernandes; M J Clemons
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  A phase II study of capecitabine plus cisplatin in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer patients pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes.

Authors:  Qiao Li; Qing Li; Pin Zhang; Peng Yuan; Jiayu Wang; Fei Ma; Yang Luo; Ying Fan; Ruigang Cai; Binghe Xu
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.742

3.  The comparison of maintenance treatment with capecitabine (CMT) and non-maintenance treatment with capecitabine (non-CMT) in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Guolei Dong; Yan Jia; Xiaorui Wang; Shufen Li; Chen Wang; Yehui Shi; Zhongsheng Tong
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-05-15

4.  A Phase II trial of the combination of vinorelbine and capecitabine as second-line treatment in metastatic breast cancer previously treated with taxanes and/or anthracyclines.

Authors:  George Orphanos; Athanasios Alexopoulos; Savvoula Malliou; George Ioannidis; Alexandros Ardavanis; Constantinos Kandylis; John Stavrakakis; Gerassimos Rigatos
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Evaluation of vinorelbine-based chemotherapy as the second or further-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Bożena Cybulska-Stopa; Marek Ziobro; Marta Skoczek; Ewelina Kojs-Pasińska; Ida Cedrych; Anna Brandys
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2013-03-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.