Literature DB >> 17551297

Dosimetry of an extracapsular anulus following permanent prostate brachytherapy.

Gregory S Merrick1, Wayne M Butler, Kent E Wallner, Zachariah A Allen, Brian Kurko, Richard L Anderson, Robert Grammer, Robert W Galbreath, Lawrence True, Edward Adamovich.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent studies have suggested that extracapsular brachytherapy treatment margins correlate with biochemical control. It is likely that volumetric geographic dosimetric parameters will be more robust than selected radial measurements. Accordingly, we evaluated extracapsular volumetric dosimetric parameters in low-risk patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 263 low-risk prostate cancer patients randomized to Pd-103 versus I-125 were implanted with a brachytherapy target volume consisting of the prostate with a 5-mm periprostatic margin. The median follow-up was 4.2 years. All patients were implanted at least 3 years prior to analysis. Within 2 hours of implantation, an axial CT was obtained for postimplant dosimetry. A 5-mm three-dimensional periprostatic anulus was constructed around the prostate and evaluated in its entirety and in 90 degrees segments. Prostate and anular dosimetric parameters consisted of V100/V150/V200 and D90. Biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) was defined as a PSA < or =0.50 ng/mL after nadir.
RESULTS: The Pd-103 and I-125 arms were well-matched in terms of clinical, biochemical, and pathologic presentation. Six-year bPFS was 96.8% versus 99.2% for I-125 versus Pd-103 (P = 0.149). The most recent median posttreatment PSA was <0.04 ng/mL for both isotopes. No significant differences in postoperative anular doses were discerned between bPFS and failed patients.
CONCLUSIONS: A postimplant 5-mm, three-dimensional periprostatic anulus provides substantial information regarding dosimetric coverage. However, with a median follow-up of 4.2 years, such volumetric and geographic parameters have not proven useful in predicting biochemical outcome in low-risk patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17551297     DOI: 10.1097/01.coc.0000258110.11024.c4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  5 in total

1.  Evidence-based guideline recommendations on low-dose rate brachytherapy in patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  George Rodrigues; Xiaomei Yao; D Andrew Loblaw; Michael Brundage; Joseph L Chin
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Low-dose rate brachytherapy for patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  George Rodrigues; Xiaomei Yao; D Andrew Loblaw; Michael Brundage; Joseph L Chin
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Prostate cancer-specific death in brachytherapy treated high-risk patients stratified by pre-treatment PSA.

Authors:  Gregory S Merrick; Robert W Galbreath; Wayne M Butler; Ryan Fiano; Edward Adamovich
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2017-08-30

4.  Permanent prostate brachytherapy extracapsular radiation dose distributions: analysis of a multi-institutional database.

Authors:  Gregory S Merrick; Wayne M Butler; Peter Grimm; Mallory Morris; Jonathan H Lief; Abbey Bennett; Ryan Fiano
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2013-10-02

5.  Does supplemental external beam radiation therapy impact urinary, bowel, and erectile function following permanent prostate brachytherapy?: results of two prospective randomized trials.

Authors:  Gregory S Merrick; Ava Tennant; Kent E Wallner; Robert Galbreath; Wayne M Butler; Ryan Fiano; Edward Adamovich
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2017-10-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.