Literature DB >> 17551146

A 25-signal proteomic signature and outcome for patients with resected non-small-cell lung cancer.

Kiyoshi Yanagisawa1, Shuta Tomida, Yukako Shimada, Yasushi Yatabe, Tetsuya Mitsudomi, Takashi Takahashi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), those with poor prognosis cannot be distinguished from those with good prognosis.
METHODS: Matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization mass spectrometry was used to analyze protein profiles of 174 specimens from NSCLC tumors and 27 specimens from normal lung tissue and to derive a prognosis-associated proteomic signature. Frozen resected tissue specimens were randomly divided into a training set (116 NSCLC and 20 normal lung specimens) and an independent, blinded validation set (58 NSCLC and seven normal lung specimens). Mass spectrometry signals from training set specimens that were differentially associated with specimens from patients with a high risk of recurrence (i.e., who died within 5 years of surgical treatment because of relapse) compared with those from patients with a low risk of recurrence (i.e., alive with no symptoms of relapse after a median follow-up of 89 months) were selected by use of the Fisher's exact test, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and the significance analysis of microarray test. These signals were used to build an individualized, weighted voting-based prognostic signature. The signature was then validated in the independent dataset. Survival was assessed by multivariable Cox regression analysis. Proteins corresponding to individual signals were identified by ion-trap mass spectrometry coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: From 2630 mass spectrometry signals from specimens in the training cohort, we derived a signature of 25 signals that was associated with both relapse-free survival and overall survival. Among stage I NSCLC patients in the validation set, the signature was statistically significantly associated with both overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] of death for patients in the high-risk group compared with those in the low-risk group = 61.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 8.9 to 419.2, P<.001) and relapse-free survival (HR of relapse = 11.7, 95% CI = 3.1 to 44.8, P<.001). Proteins corresponding to signals in the signature were identified that had various cellular functions, including ribosomal protein L26-like 1, acylphosphatase, and phosphoprotein enriched in astrocytes 15.
CONCLUSIONS: We defined a mass spectrometry signature that was associated with survival among NSCLC patients and appeared to distinguish those with poor prognosis from those with good prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17551146     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djk197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  32 in total

Review 1.  The grand challenge to decipher the cancer proteome.

Authors:  Samir Hanash; Ayumu Taguchi
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 2.  Mass spectrometry-based proteomic profiling of lung cancer.

Authors:  Sebahat Ocak; Pierre Chaurand; Pierre P Massion
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2009-04-15

3.  Comparative proteomic analysis of non-small-cell lung cancer and normal controls using serum label-free quantitative shotgun technology.

Authors:  Jun Pan; Hai-Quan Chen; Yi-Hua Sun; Jun-Hua Zhang; Xiao-Yang Luo
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 4.  The morphological and molecular diagnosis of lung cancer.

Authors:  Iver Petersen
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 5.  Biomarkers in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: current concepts and future directions.

Authors:  Mauricio Burotto; Anish Thomas; Deepa Subramaniam; Giuseppe Giaccone; Arun Rajan
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 15.609

6.  [Long-term survival of personalized surgical treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer based on molecular staging].

Authors:  Qinghua Zhou; Yingkang Shi; Jun Chen; Bin Liu; Yun Wang; Daxing Zhu; Hong-Tao Zhang; Peng Xu; Youling Gong; Gang Chen; Sen Wei; Xiaoming Qiu; Zhongxi Niu; Xiaofeng Chen; Zhe Lei; Liang Duan; Zhu Wu
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2011-02

7.  Proteomic profiling identifies pathways dysregulated in non-small cell lung cancer and an inverse association of AMPK and adhesion pathways with recurrence.

Authors:  Meera Nanjundan; Lauren Averett Byers; Mark S Carey; Doris R Siwak; Maria Gabriela Raso; Lixia Diao; Jing Wang; Kevin R Coombes; Jack A Roth; Gordon B Mills; Ignacio I Wistuba; John D Minna; John V Heymach
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 15.609

8.  Urine proteomics to detect biomarkers for chronic allograft dysfunction.

Authors:  Luís F Quintana; Amanda Solé-Gonzalez; Susana G Kalko; Elisenda Bañon-Maneus; Manel Solé; Fritz Diekmann; Alex Gutierrez-Dalmau; Joaquin Abian; Josep M Campistol
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 10.121

9.  A novel method for sample preparation of fresh lung cancer tissue for proteomics analysis by tumor cell enrichment and removal of blood contaminants.

Authors:  Luigi De Petris; Maria Pernemalm; Göran Elmberger; Per Bergman; Lotta Orre; Rolf Lewensohn; Janne Lehtiö
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 2.480

Review 10.  Genetic susceptibility to lung cancer--light at the end of the tunnel?

Authors:  Ariela L Marshall; David C Christiani
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 4.944

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.