Literature DB >> 17551011

Alternating electric fields arrest cell proliferation in animal tumor models and human brain tumors.

Eilon D Kirson1, Vladimír Dbalý, Frantisek Tovarys, Josef Vymazal, Jean F Soustiel, Aviran Itzhaki, Daniel Mordechovich, Shirley Steinberg-Shapira, Zoya Gurvich, Rosa Schneiderman, Yoram Wasserman, Marc Salzberg, Bernhard Ryffel, Dorit Goldsher, Erez Dekel, Yoram Palti.   

Abstract

We have recently shown that low intensity, intermediate frequency, electric fields inhibit by an anti-microtubule mechanism of action, cancerous cell growth in vitro. Using implanted electrodes, these fields were also shown to inhibit the growth of dermal tumors in mice. The present study extends these findings to additional cell lines [human breast carcinoma; MDA-MB-231, and human non-small-cell lung carcinoma (H1299)] and to animal tumor models (intradermal B16F1 melanoma and intracranial F-98 glioma) using external insulated electrodes. These findings led to the initiation of a pilot clinical trial of the effects of TTFields in 10 patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). Median time to disease progression in these patients was 26.1 weeks and median overall survival was 62.2 weeks. These time to disease progression and OS values are more than double the reported medians of historical control patients. No device-related serious adverse events were seen after >70 months of cumulative treatment in all of the patients. The only device-related side effect seen was a mild to moderate contact dermatitis beneath the field delivering electrodes. We conclude that TTFields are a safe and effective new treatment modality which effectively slows down tumor growth in vitro, in vivo and, as demonstrated here, in human cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17551011      PMCID: PMC1886002          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0702916104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  23 in total

1.  Transmembrane calcium influx induced by ac electric fields.

Authors:  M R Cho; H S Thatte; M T Silvia; D E Golan
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Stimulation of muscles and nerves by means of externally applied electrodes.

Authors:  Y PALTI
Journal:  Bull Res Counc Isr Sect E Exp Med       Date:  1962-06

3.  Characterization of the pore transport properties and tissue alteration of excised human skin during iontophoresis.

Authors:  R R Burnette; B Ongpipattanakul
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.534

4.  Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma.

Authors:  D R Macdonald; T L Cascino; S C Schold; J G Cairncross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Multicenter phase II trial of temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse.

Authors:  M Brada; K Hoang-Xuan; R Rampling; P Y Dietrich; L Y Dirix; D Macdonald; J J Heimans; B A Zonnenberg; J M Bravo-Marques; R Henriksson; R Stupp; N Yue; J Bruner; M Dugan; S Rao; S Zaknoen
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Morphometrical characterization of two glioma models in the brain of immunocompetent and immunodeficient rats.

Authors:  M Saini; M Bellinzona; F Meyer; G Cali; M Samii
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Phase II trial of gefitinib in recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  Jeremy N Rich; David A Reardon; Terry Peery; Jeannette M Dowell; Jennifer A Quinn; Kara L Penne; Carol J Wikstrand; Lauren B Van Duyn; Janet E Dancey; Roger E McLendon; James C Kao; Timothy T Stenzel; B K Ahmed Rasheed; Sandra E Tourt-Uhlig; James E Herndon; James J Vredenburgh; John H Sampson; Allan H Friedman; Darell D Bigner; Henry S Friedman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-11-24       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Comparison of iodotyrosines and methionine uptake in a rat glioma model.

Authors:  K J Langen; R P Clauss; M Holschbach; H Mühlensiepen; J C Kiwit; K Zilles; H H Coenen; H W Müller-Gärtner
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Disruption of cancer cell replication by alternating electric fields.

Authors:  Eilon D Kirson; Zoya Gurvich; Rosa Schneiderman; Erez Dekel; Aviran Itzhaki; Yoram Wasserman; Rachel Schatzberger; Yoram Palti
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Characterization of electric field-induced fusion in erythrocyte ghost membranes.

Authors:  A E Sowers
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  207 in total

1.  A toy model of fractal glioma development under RF electric field treatment.

Authors:  A Iomin
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 1.890

2.  Microbial growth inhibition by alternating electric fields in mice with Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection.

Authors:  Moshe Giladi; Yaara Porat; Alexandra Blatt; Esther Shmueli; Yoram Wasserman; Eilon D Kirson; Yoram Palti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: definition, selection, and reporting practices.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Timothy A Wagner; Pedro C Miranda; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus; Sarah H Lisanby; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Microbial growth inhibition by alternating electric fields.

Authors:  Moshe Giladi; Yaara Porat; Alexandra Blatt; Yoram Wasserman; Eilon D Kirson; Erez Dekel; Yoram Palti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Contributors to contrast between glioma and brain tissue in chemical exchange saturation transfer sensitive imaging at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Rachel Scheidegger; Eric T Wong; David C Alsop
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Thermoplastic microfluidic bioreactors with integrated electrodes to study tumor treating fields on yeast cells.

Authors:  Elif Gencturk; Kutlu O Ulgen; Senol Mutlu
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 2.800

7.  Low-intensity alternating electric fields: a potentially safe and effective treatment of cancer?

Authors:  Thies Schroeder; Benjamin L Viglianti; Mark W Dewhirst
Journal:  Onkologie       Date:  2008-06-23

8.  Tumor-treating fields induce autophagy by blocking the Akt2/miR29b axis in glioblastoma cells.

Authors:  Eun Ho Kim; Yunhui Jo; Sei Sai; Mung-Jin Park; Jeong-Yub Kim; Jin Su Kim; Yeon-Joo Lee; Jae-Min Cho; Seo-Young Kwak; Jeong-Hwa Baek; Youn Kyoung Jeong; Jie-Young Song; Myonggeun Yoon; Sang-Gu Hwang
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Chemotherapeutic treatment efficacy and sensitivity are increased by adjuvant alternating electric fields (TTFields).

Authors:  Eilon D Kirson; Rosa S Schneiderman; Vladimír Dbalý; Frantisek Tovarys; Josef Vymazal; Aviran Itzhaki; Daniel Mordechovich; Zoya Gurvich; Esther Shmueli; Dorit Goldsher; Yoram Wasserman; Yoram Palti
Journal:  BMC Med Phys       Date:  2009-01-08

10.  Alternating electric fields (TTFields) inhibit metastatic spread of solid tumors to the lungs.

Authors:  Eilon D Kirson; Moshe Giladi; Zoya Gurvich; Aviran Itzhaki; Daniel Mordechovich; Rosa S Schneiderman; Yoram Wasserman; Bernhard Ryffel; Dorit Goldsher; Yoram Palti
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 5.150

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.