Literature DB >> 17550920

Computer-based quantification of the mean Achilles tendon thickness in ultrasound images: effect of tendinosis.

R Syha1, M Peters, H Birnesser, A Niess, A Hirschmueller, H-H Dickhuth, M Sandrock.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: B-mode measurement of the sagital diameter of the Achilles tendon based on a manual tracing (MT) procedure is partly dependent on the subjectivity of the reader. The aim of this study is to establish a standardised automatic procedure to differentiate between normal and chronically degenerated tendons. For this comparison, the tracing results of the tendon boundaries of an automatic identification (AI) process, already established with the detection of intima-media thickness, are compared with computer-assisted MT.
METHODS: The detection of the tendon boundaries was performed in 115 ultrasound images including the cranial border of the calcaneal tuberosity. The measured section (starting point 4 cm away from the anterior boundary of the calcaneal tuberosity) amounted to 3 cm, and was divided into three sub-segments (1 cm each). Intra- and inter-reader/observer variability for mean and maximum Achilles tendon thickness (ATT) with AI and MT were evaluated. A normal group and a group with clinically diagnosed chronic tendon degeneration had mean and maximum ATT readings compared.
RESULTS: Using MT, the intra- and inter-reader variability was 3.0% and 6.8%, respectively, using AI the variability was 1.6% and 3.9%, respectively. Mean and maximum ATT were measured systematically lower by AI compared to MT in all regions by 0.4 mm. The AI procedure was most accurate in the second segment. The mean ATT and maximum ATT were correctly detected in 93.9% and 96.6% of the images.
CONCLUSION: The AI procedure detected the ATT with a high level of precision in all three segments. The most robust measurement was reached in the second segment. It eliminates most of the inter-/intra-reader variability in ATT measurement using MT. We suggest this new method could be a new gold standard for quantification of chronic disorder in Achilles tendons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17550920      PMCID: PMC2658990          DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2007.037812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  22 in total

1.  Full- versus partial-thickness Achilles tendon tears: sonographic accuracy and characterization in 26 cases with surgical correlation.

Authors:  P Hartgerink; D P Fessell; J A Jacobson; M T van Holsbeeck
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Using snakes to detect the intimal and adventitial layers of the common carotid artery wall in sonographic images.

Authors:  Da-chuan Cheng; Arno Schmidt-Trucksäss; Kuo-sheng Cheng; Hans Burkhardt
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Computerized analysing system using the active contour in ultrasound measurement of carotid artery intima-media thickness.

Authors:  A Schmidt-Trucksäss; D C Cheng; M Sandrock; J Schulte-Mönting; R Rauramaa; M Huonker; H Burkhardt
Journal:  Clin Physiol       Date:  2001-09

4.  Distribution of sonographically detected tendon abnormalities in patients with a clinical diagnosis of chronic achilles tendinosis.

Authors:  W W Gibbon; J R Cooper; G S Radcliffe
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 0.910

Review 5.  Achilles tendon disorders in athletes.

Authors:  Anthony A Schepsis; Hugh Jones; Andrew L Haas
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 6.  Ultrasound of tendons and nerves.

Authors:  Carlo Martinoli; Stefano Bianchi; M'Hamed Dahmane; Francesca Pugliese; Maria Pia Bianchi-Zamorani; Maura Valle
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-10-19       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  [Ultrasound diagnosis of the Achilles tendon].

Authors:  W Grechenig; H Clement; G Bratschitsch; F Fankhauser; G Peicha
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 8.  Achilles tendon (TA) size and power Doppler ultrasound (PD) changes compared to MRI: a preliminary observational study.

Authors:  P J Richards; A K Dheer; I M McCall
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.350

9.  [Achilles tendon size by high resolution sonography in healthy population. Relationship with lipid levels].

Authors:  F Civeira; J J Castillo; C Calvo; J Ferrando; C de Pedro; P Martínez-Rodés; M Pocoví
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  1998-06-20       Impact factor: 1.725

10.  Significance of ultrasonographically detected asymptomatic tendinosis in the patellar and achilles tendons of elite soccer players: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Ulrich Fredberg; Lars Bolvig
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  4 in total

1.  Reliability of sonographic assessment of tendinopathy in tennis elbow.

Authors:  Leon Poltawski; Syed Ali; Vijay Jayaram; Tim Watson
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Ultrasound (US) measurement of the distance between the Achilles tendon and the posterior tibial neurovascular bundle in equinus infantile deformity.

Authors:  P Gutiérrez Carbonell; M Navarro Amoros; M Ojeda Peña; V Pellicer Garcia; L Moril Peñalver
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Foot and Lower Limb Clinical and Structural Changes in Overuse Injured Recreational Runners Using Floating Heel Shoes: Preliminary Results of a Randomised Control Trial.

Authors:  Javier Gamez-Paya; Lirios Dueñas; Anna Arnal-Gómez; Josep Carles Benítez-Martínez
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Quantitative ultrasound imaging of Achilles tendon integrity in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals: reliability and minimal detectable change.

Authors:  Marie-Josée Nadeau; Amélie Desrochers; Martin Lamontagne; Christian Larivière; Dany H Gagnon
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.303

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.