Literature DB >> 17550190

Effectiveness of computer-based auditory training in improving the perception of noise-vocoded speech.

Paula C Stacey1, A Quentin Summerfield.   

Abstract

Five experiments were designed to evaluate the effectiveness of "high-variability" lexical training in improving the ability of normal-hearing subjects to perceive noise-vocoded speech that had been spectrally shifted to simulate tonotopic misalignment. Two approaches to training were implemented. One training approach required subjects to recognize isolated words, while the other training approach required subjects to recognize words in sentences. Both approaches to training improved the ability to identify words in sentences. Improvements following a single session (lasting 1-2 h) of auditory training ranged between 7 and 12 %pts and were significantly larger than improvements following a visual control task that was matched with the auditory training task in terms of the response demands. An additional three sessions of word- and sentence-based training led to further improvements, with the average overall improvement ranging from 13 to 18% pts. When a tonotopic misalignment of 3 mm rather than 6 mm was simulated, training with several talkers led to greater generalization to new talkers than training with a single talker. The results confirm that computer-based lexical training can help overcome the effects of spectral distortions in speech, and they suggest that training materials are most effective when several talkers are included.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17550190     DOI: 10.1121/1.2713668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  24 in total

1.  Inferior frontal gyrus activation predicts individual differences in perceptual learning of cochlear-implant simulations.

Authors:  Frank Eisner; Carolyn McGettigan; Andrew Faulkner; Stuart Rosen; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Auditory externalization in hearing-impaired listeners: the effect of pinna cues and number of talkers.

Authors:  Alan W Boyd; William M Whitmer; John J Soraghan; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory training in patients with unilateral cochlear implant and contralateral acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Ting Zhang; Michael F Dorman; Qian-Jie Fu; Anthony J Spahr
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Options for Auditory Training for Adults with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Anne D Olson
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-11

Review 5.  Perceptual learning of dysarthric speech: a review of experimental studies.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Megan J McAuliffe; Julie M Liss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Digit training in noise can improve cochlear implant users' speech understanding in noise.

Authors:  Sandra I Oba; Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Minimal effects of visual memory training on auditory performance of adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Sandra I Oba; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2013

8.  Interactions between unsupervised learning and the degree of spectral mismatch on short-term perceptual adaptation to spectrally shifted speech.

Authors:  Tianhao Li; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Simulations of the effect of unlinked cochlear-implant automatic gain control and head movement on interaural level differences.

Authors:  Alan W Archer-Boyd; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Biomimetic direction of arrival estimation for resolving front-back confusions in hearing aids.

Authors:  Alan W Archer-Boyd; William M Whitmer; W Owen Brimijoin; John J Soraghan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.