Literature DB >> 17549860

A prospective analysis of Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Kyung Tae Kim1, Song Lee, Hoon Seok Park, Kun Ho Cho, Kwan Soo Kim.   

Abstract

We performed 560 minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasties in patients with osteoarthritis using the Oxford phase 3 prosthesis since January 2002. For the prospective analysis, clinical and radiographic assessments were carried out preoperatively and regularly followed after surgery. Ninety-five cases were followed at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively. In this prospective study, the early postoperative results of minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty were satisfactory for improvement of knee score and function score of the American Knee Society (AKS) score, and recovery of knee motion. The AKS knee score and function score continued to improve for 3 years postoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17549860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  13 in total

Review 1.  Causes of revision following Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Seung-Ju Kim; Ricardo Postigo; Sowon Koo; Jong Hun Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Free bone cement fragments after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an underappreciated problem.

Authors:  S M Hauptmann; P Weber; C Glaser; C Birkenmaier; V Jansson; P E Müller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-05-31       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: medial pain and functional outcome in the medium term.

Authors:  Mark C Edmondson; David Isaac; Malin Wijeratna; Sean Brink; Paul Gibb; Paul Skinner
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Medial femoral condyle fracture as an intraoperative complication of Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement.

Authors:  Bart Ten Brinke; Laurens J de Haan; Koen L M Koenraadt; Rutger C I van Geenen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Oxford phase 3 unicondylar knee arthroplasty through a minimally invasive approach: long-term results.

Authors:  Omar Faour-Martín; Jose Antonio Valverde-García; Miguel Angel Martín-Ferrero; Aurelio Vega-Castrillo; María Angeles de la Red Gallego; Cesar C Suárez de Puga; Luis Amigo-Liñares
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  The influence of postoperative tibiofemoral alignment on the clinical results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kyung Tae Kim; Song Lee; Tae Woo Kim; Jung Soo Lee; Kyung Hwan Boo
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2012-05-31

7.  The Survivorship and Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at 10-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Kyung Tae Kim; Song Lee; Jee Hyoung Kim; Sung Won Hong; Woo Shik Jung; Won Shik Shin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2015-05-18

8.  The learning curve for minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: cumulative summation test for learning curve (LC-CUSUM).

Authors:  Qidong Zhang; Qian Zhang; Wanshou Guo; Zhaohui Liu; Liming Cheng; Debo Yue; Nianfei Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Analysis and Treatment of Complications after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kyung Tae Kim; Song Lee; Jae Il Lee; Jin Woo Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2016-02-29

10.  Intentionally Increased Flexion Angle of the Femoral Component in Mobile Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kye-Youl Cho; Kang-Il Kim; Sang-Jun Song; Kyu-Jin Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.