Literature DB >> 17549807

Childhood Development after Cochlear Implantation (CDaCI) study: design and baseline characteristics.

Nancy E Fink1, Nae-Yuh Wang, Jiovani Visaya, John K Niparko, Alexandra Quittner, Laurie S Eisenberg, Emily A Tobey.   

Abstract

Children with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss face communication challenges that influence language, psychosocial and scholastic performance. Clinical studies over the past 20 years have supported wider application of cochlear implants in children. The Childhood Development after Cochlear Implantation (CDaCI) study is the first longitudinal multicentre, national cohort study to evaluate systematically early cochlear implant (CI) outcomes in children. The objective of the study was to compare children who have undergone cochlear implantation, with similarly aged hearing peers across multiple domains, including oral language development, auditory performance, psychosocial and behavioural functioning, and quality of life. The CDaCI study is a multicentre national cohort study of CI children and normal hearing (NH) peers. Eligibility criteria include informed consent, age less than 5 years, pre- or post-lingually deaf, developmental criteria met, commitment to educate the child in English and bilateral cochlear implants. All children had a standardised baseline assessment that included demographics, hearing and medical history, communication history, language measures, cognitive tests, speech recognition, an audiological exam, psychosocial assessment including parent-child videotapes and parent reported quality of life. Follow-up visits are scheduled at six-month intervals and include a standardised assessment of the full battery of measures. Quality assurance activities were incorporated into the design of the study. A total of 188 CI children and 97 NH peers were enrolled between November 2002 and December 2004. The mean age, gender and race of the CI and NH children are comparable. With regard to parental demographics, the CI and NH children's families are statistically different. The parents of CI children are younger, and not as well educated, with 49% of CI parents reporting college graduation vs. 84% of the NH parents. The income of the CI parents is also lower than the NH parents. Assessments of cognition suggest that there may be baseline differences between the CI and NH children; however the scores were high enough to suggest language learning potential. The observed group differences identified these baseline characteristics as potential confounders which may require adjustment in analyses of outcomes. This longitudinal cohort study addresses questions related to high variability in language outcomes. Identifying sources of that variance requires research designs that: characterise potential predictors with accuracy, use samples that adequately power a study, and employ controls and approaches to analysis that limit bias and error. The CDaCI study was designed to generate a more complete picture of the interactive processes of language learning after implantation. 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17549807     DOI: 10.1179/cim.2007.8.2.92

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int        ISSN: 1467-0100


  44 in total

1.  Cochlear implantation updates: the Dallas Cochlear Implant Program.

Authors:  Emily A Tobey; Lana Britt; Ann Geers; Philip Loizou; Betty Loy; Peter Roland; Andrea Warner-Czyz; Charles G Wright
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Studies in pediatric hearing loss at the House Research Institute.

Authors:  Laurie S Eisenberg; Karen C Johnson; Amy S Martinez; Leslie Visser-Dumont; Dianne Hammes Ganguly; Jennifer F Still
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery at Johns Hopkins: The first 100 years (1914-2014).

Authors:  Howard W Francis; Ira Papel; Ioan Lina; Wayne Koch; David Tunkel; Paul Fuchs; Sandra Lin; David Kennedy; Robert Ruben; Fred Linthicum; Bernard Marsh; Simon Best; John Carey; Andrew Lane; Patrick Byrne; Paul Flint; David W Eisele
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Comparisons of IQ in Children With and Without Cochlear Implants: Longitudinal Findings and Associations With Language.

Authors:  Ivette Cejas; Christine M Mitchell; Michael Hoffman; Alexandra L Quittner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Comparisons of social competence in young children with and without hearing loss: a dynamic systems framework.

Authors:  Michael F Hoffman; Alexandra L Quittner; Ivette Cejas
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2014-12-10

6.  A Prospective Longitudinal Study of U.S. Children Unable to Achieve Open-Set Speech Recognition 5 Years After Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Jennifer M Barnard; Laurel M Fisher; Karen C Johnson; Laurie S Eisenberg; Nae-Yuh Wang; Alexandra L Quittner; Christine M Carson; John K Niparko
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Development of joint engagement in young deaf and hearing children: effects of chronological age and language skills.

Authors:  Ivette Cejas; David H Barker; Alexandra L Quittner; John K Niparko
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Early Sign Language Exposure and Cochlear Implantation Benefits.

Authors:  Ann E Geers; Christine M Mitchell; Andrea Warner-Czyz; Nae-Yuh Wang; Laurie S Eisenberg
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Influence of implantation age on school-age language performance in pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Emily A Tobey; Donna Thal; John K Niparko; Laurie S Eisenberg; Alexandra L Quittner; Nae-Yuh Wang
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  Comparisons of visual attention in school-age children with cochlear implants versus hearing peers and normative data.

Authors:  Michael Hoffman; Elena Tiddens; Alexandra L Quittner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.