Literature DB >> 17548891

Temporal integration in nasal lateralization of homologous alcohols.

Paul M Wise1, Sean E Toczydlowski, Charles J Wysocki.   

Abstract

Through temporal integration, sensory systems accumulate stimulus energy, e.g., photons, acoustic energy, or molecules, over time to detect weaker signals than they otherwise could. Past studies found imperfect temporal integration in detection of nasal irritation: To maintain a fixed level of detection, one must increase stimulus duration by more than twofold to compensate for cutting concentration in half. Despite this generality, integration varied widely among compounds, from nearly perfect, i.e., an increase in duration of slightly more than twofold could compensate for cutting concentration in half, to highly imperfect. How do such differences relate to molecular parameters? Perhaps molecules that more readily dissolve into the lipid-rich perireceptor environment will accumulate, and therefore integrate, better over time. To test this hypothesis, studies compared temporal integration for three compounds that differ systematically in lipid solubility: n-ethanol, n-butanol, and n-hexanol. Subjects were healthy, adult humans. Nasal lateralization was used to measure irritation threshold. Subjects received a fixed concentration of a single compound within each experimental session, and stimulus duration was varied to find the briefest stimulus subjects could reliably lateralize. Concentration and compound varied across sessions. Consistent with the hypothesis, integration did become closer to perfect as lipid solubility increased. That just one molecular parameter can help predict degree of integration suggests that a structure-activity approach to understanding temporal integration shows promise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17548891      PMCID: PMC2567841          DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfm144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  25 in total

1.  Experimental and numerical determination of odorant solubility in nasal and olfactory mucosa.

Authors:  Daniel B Kurtz; Kai Zhao; David E Hornung; Peter Scherer
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Temporal integration of nasal irritation from ammonia at threshold and supra-threshold levels.

Authors:  Paul M Wise; Thomas M Canty; Charles J Wysocki
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Cutoff in detection of eye irritation from vapors of homologous carboxylic acids and aliphatic aldehydes.

Authors:  J E Cometto-Muñiz; W S Cain; M H Abraham; R Sánchez-Moreno
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Psychophysical examination of pain induced by defined CO2 pulses applied to the nasal mucosa.

Authors:  Fernand Anton; Ingrid Euchner; Hermann O Handwerker
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Evaluation of olfactory dysfunction in the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center.

Authors:  W S Cain; J F Gent; R B Goodspeed; G Leonard
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Expression of cytochrome p450 and other biotransformation genes in fetal and adult human nasal mucosa.

Authors:  Xiuling Zhang; Qing-Yu Zhang; Dazhi Liu; Ting Su; Yan Weng; Guoyu Ling; Ying Chen; Jun Gu; Boris Schilling; Xinxin Ding
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2005-07-13       Impact factor: 3.922

7.  Dose-dependent stereoselective activation of the trigeminal sensory system by nicotine in man.

Authors:  N Thuerauf; M Kaegler; R Dietz; A Barocka; G Kobal
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Time course of sensory eye irritation in humans exposed to N-butanol and 1-octene.

Authors:  A Hempel-Jørgensen; S K Kjaergaard; L Môlhave; H K Hudnell
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr

9.  The influence of cognitive bias on the perceived odor, irritation and health symptoms from chemical exposure.

Authors:  P Dalton; C J Wysocki; M J Brody; H J Lawley
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.015

10.  Stereospecificity of the sensory irritation receptor for nonreactive chemicals illustrated by pinene enantiomers.

Authors:  J P Kasanen; A L Pasanen; P Pasanen; J Liesivuori; V M Kosma; Y Alarie
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.153

View more
  2 in total

1.  Dynamics of nasal irritation from pulsed homologous alcohols.

Authors:  Paul M Wise; Kai Zhao; Charles J Wysocki
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Temporal integration in nasal lateralization of homologous propionates.

Authors:  Paul M Wise; Sean E Toczydlowski; Kai Zhao; Charles J Wysocki
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.724

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.