Literature DB >> 1754856

Endoscopic follow-up study of gastric ulcer to detect malignancy: is it worthwhile?

P Bytzer1.   

Abstract

Endoscopic follow-up study of gastric ulcer to detect cancer is held to be mandatory. To evaluate the benefits of this routine strategy, 913 index endoscopies for gastric ulcer in 773 patients during the 3-year period 1985-87 were analyzed. Correctness of diagnosis was verified through surgery, autopsy, or clinical follow-up. Endoscopic follow-up was done in 83% of the cases, totaling 1269 endoscopies, showing gastric cancer in 10 patients. Clinical outcome, however, was poor for five of these (early death). Five additional cancer cases were missed by the endoscopic follow-up. In the same period 63 gastric cancers were found at the first endoscopy; 9 of these were diagnosed through biopsies only. Predictive values of the macroscopic judgements of benign lesion or probable/definite malignancy were 0.98 and 0.40, respectively. Evaluation of case records did not indicate characteristics that would have helped in the correct differentiation between benign and malignant lesions. Thus, each case of curable gastric cancer is found at the expense of approximately 250 follow-up endoscopies. We are in need of sensitive and specific markers for possible malignancy in the patient with apparently benign gastric ulcer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1754856     DOI: 10.3109/00365529108998613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  6 in total

1.  Follow-up endoscopy for benign-appearing gastric ulcers has no additive value in detecting malignancy: It is time to individualise surveillance endoscopy.

Authors:  Eric A R Gielisse; Johan P Kuyvenhoven
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Endoscopic follow-up for all gastric ulcers to detect malignancy?

Authors:  P Bytzer
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  The usefulness of ulcer size and location in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant gastric ulcer.

Authors:  Erdem Koçak; Fatma Kılıç; Erdem Akbal; Adnan Taş; Seyfettin Köklü; Levent Filik; Ibrahim Bıyıkoğlu; Bilal Ergül
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 1.704

4.  Gastric cancer and other endoscopic diagnoses in patients with benign dyspepsia.

Authors:  N P Breslin; A B Thomson; R J Bailey; P K Blustein; J Meddings; E Lalor; G M VanRosendaal; M J Verhoef; L R Sutherland
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Utilization of upper endoscopy for surveillance of gastric ulcers in the United States.

Authors:  Sameer D Saini; Glenn Eisen; Nora Mattek; Philip Schoenfeld
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  The distinctive gastric fluid proteome in gastric cancer reveals a multi-biomarker diagnostic profile.

Authors:  Oi Lian Kon; Tai-Tung Yip; Meng Fatt Ho; Weng Hoong Chan; Wai Keong Wong; Soo Yong Tan; Wai Har Ng; Siok Yuen Kam; Alvin Kh Eng; Patrick Ho; Rosa Viner; Hock Soo Ong; M Priyanthi Kumarasinghe
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 3.063

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.