Literature DB >> 17548226

Physiology and pathology of eye-head coordination.

Frank Antony Proudlock1, Irene Gottlob.   

Abstract

Human head movement control can be considered as part of the oculomotor system since the control of gaze involves coordination of the eyes and head. Humans show a remarkable degree of flexibility in eye-head coordination strategies, nonetheless an individual will often demonstrate stereotypical patterns of eye-head behaviour for a given visual task. This review examines eye-head coordination in laboratory-based visual tasks, such as saccadic gaze shifts and combined eye-head pursuit, and in common tasks in daily life, such as reading. The effect of the aging process on eye-head coordination is then reviewed from infancy through to senescence. Consideration is also given to how pathology can affect eye-head coordination from the lowest through to the highest levels of oculomotor control, comparing conditions as diverse as eye movement restrictions and schizophrenia. Given the adaptability of the eye-head system we postulate that this flexible system is under the control of the frontal cortical regions, which assist in planning, coordinating and executing behaviour. We provide evidence for this based on changes in eye-head coordination dependant on the context and expectation of presented visual stimuli, as well as from changes in eye-head coordination caused by frontal lobe dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17548226     DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2007.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res        ISSN: 1350-9462            Impact factor:   21.198


  11 in total

1.  Automatic and intentional influences on saccade landing.

Authors:  David Aagten-Murphy; Paul M Bays
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Saccadic eye movement performance reduces visual manipulation influence and center of pressure displacements in older fallers.

Authors:  Nathaly Freitas de Souza; Matheus Belizário Brito; Sérgio Tosi Rodrigues; Beatriz Carvalho Cavalieri; Diego Nera Lima; Rodolfo Lemes de Moraes; Fabio Augusto Barbieri; José Angelo Barela; Paula Fávaro Polastri
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Learning the optimal control of coordinated eye and head movements.

Authors:  Sohrab Saeb; Cornelius Weber; Jochen Triesch
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  A genome-wide screen for acrophobia susceptibility loci in a Finnish isolate.

Authors:  Zuzanna Misiewicz; Tero Hiekkalinna; Tiina Paunio; Teppo Varilo; Joseph D Terwilliger; Timo Partonen; Iiris Hovatta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Optic Nerve Sheath Tethering in Adduction Occurs in Esotropia and Hypertropia, But Not in Exotropia.

Authors:  Soh Youn Suh; Robert A Clark; Joseph L Demer
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 6.  Residual vision activation and the brain-eye-vascular triad: Dysregulation, plasticity and restoration in low vision and blindness - a review.

Authors:  Bernhard A Sabel; Josef Flammer; Lotfi B Merabet
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.406

7.  Comparative Analysis of Kinect-Based and Oculus-Based Gaze Region Estimation Methods in a Driving Simulator.

Authors:  David González-Ortega; Francisco Javier Díaz-Pernas; Mario Martínez-Zarzuela; Míriam Antón-Rodríguez
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Eye-head coordination abnormalities in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Simon Schwab; Othmar Würmle; Nadja Razavi; René M Müri; Andreas Altorfer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Eyelid Opening with Trigeminal Proprioceptive Activation Regulates a Brainstem Arousal Mechanism.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Matsuo; Ryokuya Ban; Yuki Hama; Shunsuke Yuzuriha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Driving with binocular visual field loss? A study on a supervised on-road parcours with simultaneous eye and head tracking.

Authors:  Enkelejda Kasneci; Katrin Sippel; Kathrin Aehling; Martin Heister; Wolfgang Rosenstiel; Ulrich Schiefer; Elena Papageorgiou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.