OBJECTIVE: To compare standard interlocking nails (ILN) with a newly designed ILN featuring an angle-stable locking mechanism (ILNn). STUDY DESIGN: Six experimental groups. SAMPLE POPULATION: Bone models (n=48) treated with 6 and 8 mm nails locked with screws or bolts (ILN6s, ILN8s, ILN6b, ILN8b, respectively), ILNn, and a 3.5 mm broad-DCP (br-DCP); n=4/testing mode. METHODS: Specimens were tested in torsion or 4-point bending. Construct compliance, deformation, and slack were statistically compared (P<.05). RESULTS: Regardless of testing mode, construct compliance was greater with smaller ILN. Screwed constructs were more compliant than bolted ones, with a significant difference between ILN6s and ILN6b in torsion. Plated constructs were significantly more compliant than the ILNn. Angular deformation was consistently greater with smaller ILN. Screwed ILN constructs sustained approximately 2 x the torsional deformation of the bolted ones (approximately 36 degrees [ILN6s] versus approximately 18 degrees [ILN6b]). Comparatively, ILNn constructs had significantly less torsional (approximately 8 degrees) and bending (approximately 4 degrees) deformation than other constructs. Whereas standard ILN constructs had slack in both modes, ILNn and br-DCP construct deformations consistently occurred without slack. CONCLUSIONS: Use of bolts rather than screws improved ILN mechanical behavior, but neither locking mechanism completely counteracted torsion and bending forces. Conversely, the ILNn angle-stable locking system eliminated torsional and bending slack, resulting in comparable mechanical performances between ILNn and plated constructs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The angle-stable locking mechanism of the new ILN eliminates all slack in the system; thus, interfragmentary motion will likely be reduced compared with standard ILN, which may improve the local environment for fracture healing.
OBJECTIVE: To compare standard interlocking nails (ILN) with a newly designed ILN featuring an angle-stable locking mechanism (ILNn). STUDY DESIGN: Six experimental groups. SAMPLE POPULATION: Bone models (n=48) treated with 6 and 8 mm nails locked with screws or bolts (ILN6s, ILN8s, ILN6b, ILN8b, respectively), ILNn, and a 3.5 mm broad-DCP (br-DCP); n=4/testing mode. METHODS: Specimens were tested in torsion or 4-point bending. Construct compliance, deformation, and slack were statistically compared (P<.05). RESULTS: Regardless of testing mode, construct compliance was greater with smaller ILN. Screwed constructs were more compliant than bolted ones, with a significant difference between ILN6s and ILN6b in torsion. Plated constructs were significantly more compliant than the ILNn. Angular deformation was consistently greater with smaller ILN. Screwed ILN constructs sustained approximately 2 x the torsional deformation of the bolted ones (approximately 36 degrees [ILN6s] versus approximately 18 degrees [ILN6b]). Comparatively, ILNn constructs had significantly less torsional (approximately 8 degrees) and bending (approximately 4 degrees) deformation than other constructs. Whereas standard ILN constructs had slack in both modes, ILNn and br-DCP construct deformations consistently occurred without slack. CONCLUSIONS: Use of bolts rather than screws improved ILN mechanical behavior, but neither locking mechanism completely counteracted torsion and bending forces. Conversely, the ILNn angle-stable locking system eliminated torsional and bending slack, resulting in comparable mechanical performances between ILNn and plated constructs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The angle-stable locking mechanism of the new ILN eliminates all slack in the system; thus, interfragmentary motion will likely be reduced compared with standard ILN, which may improve the local environment for fracture healing.
Authors: Meghan R Kubacki; Christopher A Verioti; Savan D Patel; Adam N Garlock; David Fernandez; Patrick J Atkinson Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2013-09-19 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: W B Saunders; L M Dejardin; E V Soltys-Niemann; C N Kaulfus; B M Eichelberger; L K Dobson; B R Weeks; S C Kerwin; C A Gregory Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol Date: 2022-09-02