Literature DB >> 17547235

Conservation of transmission phenotype of Anaplasma marginale (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae) strains among Dermacentor and Rhipicephalus ticks (Acari: Ixodidae).

Glen A Scoles1, Massaro W Ueti, Susan M Noh, Donald P Knowles, Guy H Palmer.   

Abstract

Before the eradication of Boophilus ticks from the United States, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Canestrini) and Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus (Say) were important biological vectors of the cattle pathogen Anaplasma marginale Theiler. In the absence of Boophilus ticks, A. marginale continues to be transmitted by Dermacentor ticks. However, a few U.S. strains are not transmissible by Dermacentor andersoni Stiles, Dermacentor variabilis (Say), or both, raising the question of how these strains evolved and how they are maintained. We hypothesize that the U.S. non-Dermacentor-transmissible strains of A. marginale were formerly Boophilus-transmitted strains that have been maintained by a combination of persistent infection and mechanical transmission since the eradication of their biological vector from the United States. To test this hypothesis, we attempted to transmit a well-documented non-Dermacentor-transmissible A. marginale strain (Florida), by using D. andersoni and the two Boophilus species that formerly occurred in the United States. For comparison, we examined tick-borne transmission of a strain of A. marginale (Puerto Rico), which has previously been shown to be transmissible by both D. andersoni and B. microplus. All three species of tick transmitted the Puerto Rico strain, and immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis confirmed the presence ofA. marginale colonies in their salivary glands. All three tick species failed to transmit the Florida strain. Although both D. andersoni and B. microplus acquired transient midgut and salivary gland infections after acquisition feeding, we were unable to detect colonies of the Florida strain in the salivary glands with IHC. This demonstrates that the transmission phenotype ofA. marginale strains is conserved among tick species, and it suggests that the failure of the Florida strain to be transmitted by ticks is related to a general inability to efficiently invade or replicate in tick cells, rather than to a failure to invade or replicate in cells of a specific tick species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17547235     DOI: 10.1603/0022-2585(2007)44[484:cotpoa]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Entomol        ISSN: 0022-2585            Impact factor:   2.278


  22 in total

1.  Association of pathogen strain-specific gene transcription and transmission efficiency phenotype of Anaplasma marginale.

Authors:  Joseph T Agnes; David Herndon; Massaro W Ueti; Solomon S Ramabu; Marc Evans; Kelly A Brayton; Guy H Palmer
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Physical linkage of naturally complexed bacterial outer membrane proteins enhances immunogenicity.

Authors:  Henriette Macmillan; Junzo Norimine; Kelly A Brayton; Guy H Palmer; Wendy C Brown
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Is the cattle tick Rhipicephalus annulatus Say, 1821 reared on the rabbit?

Authors:  Sobhy Abdel-Shafy
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2018-04-23

4.  Assessment of bacterial diversity in Hyalomma aegyptium, H. marginatum and H. excavatum ticks through tag-encoded pyrosequencing.

Authors:  Adem Keskin; Ahmet Bursali; David E Snow; Scot E Dowd; Saban Tekin
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.132

5.  Anaplasma marginale Actively Modulates Vacuolar Maturation during Intracellular Infection of Its Tick Vector, Dermacentor andersoni.

Authors:  Forgivemore Magunda; Chelsea Wright Thompson; David A Schneider; Susan M Noh
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Serum antibodies from a subset of horses positive for Babesia caballi by competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay demonstrate a protein recognition pattern that is not consistent with infection.

Authors:  Peter O Awinda; Robert H Mealey; Laura B A Williams; Patricia A Conrad; Andrea E Packham; Kathryn E Reif; Juanita F Grause; Angela M Pelzel-McCluskey; Chungwon Chung; Reginaldo G Bastos; Lowell S Kappmeyer; Daniel K Howe; SallyAnne L Ness; Donald P Knowles; Massaro W Ueti
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2013-09-18

7.  Quantitative differences in salivary pathogen load during tick transmission underlie strain-specific variation in transmission efficiency of Anaplasma marginale.

Authors:  Massaro W Ueti; Donald P Knowles; Christine M Davitt; Glen A Scoles; Timothy V Baszler; Guy H Palmer
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Independence of Anaplasma marginale strains with high and low transmission efficiencies in the tick vector following simultaneous acquisition by feeding on a superinfected mammalian reservoir host.

Authors:  Maria F B M Galletti; Massaro W Ueti; Donald P Knowles; Kelly A Brayton; Guy H Palmer
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  Tick-borne transmission of two genetically distinct Anaplasma marginale strains following superinfection of the mammalian reservoir host.

Authors:  Christina K Leverich; Guy H Palmer; Donald P Knowles; Kelly A Brayton
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  Persistently infected horses are reservoirs for intrastadial tick-borne transmission of the apicomplexan parasite Babesia equi.

Authors:  Massaro W Ueti; Guy H Palmer; Glen A Scoles; Lowell S Kappmeyer; Donald P Knowles
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 3.441

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.